Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26059718›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2015

Automated profiling of individual cell-cell interactions from high-throughput time-lapse imaging microscopy in nanowell grids (TIMING).

Amine Merouane, Nicolas Rey-Villamizar, Yanbin Lu, Ivan Liadi, Gabrielle Romain, Jennifer Lu, Harjeet Singh, Laurence J N Cooper, Navin Varadarajan, Badrinath Roysam

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Aardvark: Composite Visualizations of Trees, Time-Series, and Images.IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microraft arrays for serial-killer CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells and single cell isolation.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amine MerouaneDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and.
Nicolas Rey-VillamizarDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and.
Yanbin LuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and.
Ivan LiadiDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA and.
Gabrielle RomainDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA and.
Jennifer LuDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA and.
Harjeet SinghDivision of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Laurence J N CooperDivision of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Navin VaradarajanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA and.
Badrinath RoysamDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering and.
University of Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Quantitative single-cell biomarkers of T-cells to optimize tumor immunotherapyR01CA174385 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON · PI COOPER, LAURENCE J.N., VARADARAJAN, NAVIN · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174385NCI NIH HHS R01CA174385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThere is a need for effective automated methods for profiling dynamic cell-cell interactions with single-cell resolution from high-throughput time-lapse imaging data, especially, the interactions between immune effector cells and tumor cells in adoptive immunotherapy.

resultsFluorescently labeled human T cells, natural killer cells (NK), and various target cells (NALM6, K562, EL4) were co-incubated on polydimethylsiloxane arrays of sub-nanoliter wells (nanowells), and imaged using multi-channel time-lapse microscopy. The proposed cell segmentation and tracking algorithms account for cell variability and exploit the nanowell confinement property to increase the yield of correctly analyzed nanowells from 45% (existing algorithms) to 98% for wells containing one effector and a single target, enabling automated quantification of cell locations, morphologies, movements, interactions, and deaths without the need for manual proofreading. Automated analysis of recordings from 12 different experiments demonstrated automated nanowell delineation accuracy >99%, automated cell segmentation accuracy >95%, and automated cell tracking accuracy of 90%, with default parameters, despite variations in illumination, staining, imaging noise, cell morphology, and cell clustering. An example analysis revealed that NK cells efficiently discriminate between live and dead targets by altering the duration of conjugation. The data also demonstrated that cytotoxic cells display higher motility than non-killers, both before and during contact. CONTACT: broysam@central.uh.edu or nvaradar@central.uh.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell CommunicationCell MovementCells, CulturedCell TrackingCoculture TechniquesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedK562 CellsKiller Cells, NaturalNanostructuresTime-Lapse ImagingT-Lymphocytes

Identifiers

PMID26059718
PMCPMC4693004
OpenAlexW2289495393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.