SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Social skills programmes for schizophrenia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Humour-based interventions for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Are Randomized Controlled Trials on Pharmacotherapy and Psychotherapy for Positive Symptoms of Schizophrenia Comparable? A Systematic Review of Patient and Study Characteristics.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2020Pooled it
- Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Occupational therapy delivered by specialists versus non-specialists for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- A Meta-Analysis of Social Skills Training and Related Interventions for Psychosis.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Pooled it
- Community-based psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia in low and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- The Effects of Metacognition-Oriented Social Skills Training on Psychosocial Outcome in Schizophrenia-Spectrum Disorders: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2018Trial
- A multicenter, randomized controlled trial of individualized occupational therapy for patients with schizophrenia in Japan.PloS one · 2018Trial
- A pilot study on feasibility, acceptance and effectiveness of metacognitive-oriented social skills training in schizophrenia.BMC psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Predictors for quality of life improvement in schizophrenia: a prospective study of patients in hospital-based rehabilitation programs.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Clinical practice guidelines for management of schizophrenia in India: A comprehensive overview.Indian journal of psychiatry · 2026Article
- Comparing interventions for early psychosis: a systematic review and component network meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Psychosocial and psychological interventions for schizophrenia relapse prevention: A bibliometric analysis.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Better adherence to guidelines among psychiatrists providing pharmacological therapy is associated with longer work hours in patients with schizophrenia.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Analysis of hindering and facilitating factors of help-seeking behavior in schizophrenia based on COM-B model: a descriptive qualitative study.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of interventions for improving social inclusion outcomes for people with disabilities in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.Campbell systematic reviews · 2023Review
- Development of a Mobile Assessment Tool for Understanding Social Comparison Processes Among Individuals With Schizophrenia: Two-Phase Survey Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial skills programmes (SSP) are treatment strategies aimed at enhancing the social performance and reducing the distress and difficulty experienced by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia and can be incorporated as part of the rehabilitation package for people with schizophrenia.
objectivesThe primary objective is to investigate the effects of social skills training programmes, compared to standard care, for people with schizophrenia. SEARCH
methodsWe searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Trials Register (November 2006 and December 2011) which is based on regular searches of CINAHL, BIOSIS, AMED, EMBASE, PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and registries of clinical trials. We inspected references of all identified studies for further trials.A further search for studies has been conducted by the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group in 2015, 37 citations have been found and are currently being assessed by review authors. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all relevant randomised controlled trials for social skills programmes versus standard care involving people with serious mental illnesses. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data independently. For dichotomous data we calculated risk ratios (RRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated mean differences (MD) and 95% CIs. MAIN
resultsWe included 13 randomised trials (975 participants). These evaluated social skills programmes versus standard care, or discussion group. We found evidence in favour of social skills programmes compared to standard care on all measures of social functioning. We also found that rates of relapse and rehospitalisation were lower for social skills compared to standard care (relapse: 2 RCTs, n = 263, RR 0.52 CI 0.34 to 0.79, very low quality evidence), (rehospitalisation: 1 RCT, n = 143, RR 0.53 CI 0.30 to 0.93, very low quality evidence) and participants' mental state results (1 RCT, n = 91, MD -4.01 CI -7.52 to -0.50, very low quality evidence) were better in the group receiving social skill programmes. Global state was measured in one trial by numbers not experiencing a clinical improvement, results favoured social skills (1 RCT, n = 67, RR 0.29 CI 0.12 to 0.68, very low quality evidence). Quality of life was also improved in the social skills programme compared to standard care (1 RCT, n = 112, MD -7.60 CI -12.18 to -3.02, very low quality evidence). However, when social skills programmes were compared to a discussion group control, we found no significant differences in the participants social functioning, relapse rates, mental state or quality of life, again the quality of evidence for these outcomes was very low. AUTHORS'
conclusionsCompared to standard care, social skills training may improve the social skills of people with schizophrenia and reduce relapse rates, but at present, the evidence is very limited with data rated as very low quality. When social skills training was compared to discussion there was no difference on patients outcomes. Cultural differences might limit the applicability of the current results, as most reported studies were conducted in China. Whether social skills training can improve social functioning of people with schizophrenia in different settings remains unclear and should be investigated in a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.