Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26059247›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2015

Targeted therapies for ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer.

Mutsuko Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Monica Arnedos, Fabrice André

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. p21Cancers · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging ways to treat breast cancer: will promises be met?Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mutsuko Yamamoto-IbusukiDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan. mibusuki@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Monica ArnedosDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France. monica.arnedos@gustaveroussy.fr.
Fabrice AndréDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France. fabrice.andre@gustaveroussy.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of breast cancers present with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-negative features and might benefit from endocrine therapy. Although endocrine therapy has notably evolved during the last decades, the invariable appearance of endocrine resistance, either primary or secondary, remains an important issue in this type of tumor. The improvement of our understanding of the cancer genome has identified some promising targets that might be responsible or linked to endocrine resistance, including alterations affecting main signaling pathways like PI3K/Akt/mTOR and CCND1/CDK4-6 as well as the identification of new ESR1 somatic mutations, leading to an array of new targeted therapies that might circumvent or prevent endocrine resistance. In this review, we have summarized the main targeted therapies that are currently being tested in ER+ breast cancer, the rationale behind them, and the new agents and combinational treatments to come.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyReceptors, EstrogenAntineoplastic AgentsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID26059247
PMCPMC4462184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.