Trial reportTrials2015
A consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led, educational intervention to reduce inappropriate medication use in community older adults (D-PRESCRIBE trial): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02053194 (Developing Pharmacist-led Research to Educate and Sensitive Community Residents to the Inappropriate Prescription Burden in the Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing Pharmacist-led Research to Educate and Sensitive Community Residents to the Inappropriate Prescription Burden in the Elderly
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effective deprescribing strategies for reducing potentially inappropriate medications and improving economic outcomes in community-based settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Availability and readability of patient education materials for deprescribing: An environmental scan.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic review of interventions to deprescribe benzodiazepines and other hypnotics among older people.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Pooled it
- Applying Implementation Science Methods to Prospectively Track the Adaptation of an Evidence-Based Deprescribing Intervention for Use in a New Health System and Country.The Permanente journal · 2026Trial
- Impact of deprescribing rounds on discharge prescriptions: an interventional trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Approach to the Patient Considering Thyroid Hormone Deprescribing.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Community Pharmacists Regarding Proton Pump Inhibitor (PPI) Use: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engaging Patients in Discussions About Medication Deprescribing.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Protocol to evaluate the feasibility of the D-PRESCRIBE intervention adapted to the Belgian community setting (END-IT CS study).BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Lessons for deprescribing from a nonessential medication hold policy in US nursing homes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- Article
- Does a Consumer-Targeted Deprescribing Intervention Compromise Patient-Healthcare Provider Trust?Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Studying de-implementation in health: an analysis of funded research grants.Implementation science : IS · 2017Article
- Impact of pharmacist interventions in older patients: a prospective study in a tertiary hospital in Germany.Clinical interventions in aging · 2016Article
- The relevance of educating doctors, pharmacists and older patients about potentially inappropriate medications.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015Article
- A prototype for evidence-based pharmaceutical opinions to promote physician-pharmacist communication around deprescribing.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedication safety for older persons represents an ongoing challenge. Inappropriate prescriptions--those with a high risk of evidence-based harm--persist in up to 25% of seniors, and account for a significant proportion of avoidable emergency department visits. This project is the sequel to the EMPOWER study, in which a novel consumer-targeted written knowledge transfer tool aimed at empowering older adults to act as drivers of benzodiazepine de-prescription resulted in a 27% reduction of inappropriate benzodiazepine use at 6-month follow-up (number needed to treat (NNT) = 4). Failure to discontinue in the EMPOWER study was attributable to re-emerging symptoms among participants, prescribing inertia, and lack of knowledge and skills for substituting alternate therapy among physicians and pharmacists. To maximize de-prescription of inappropriate therapy, educational medication-risk reduction initiatives should be tested that simultaneously include patients, physicians and pharmacists. The objective of this trial is to: 1) test the beneficial effect of a new de-prescribing paradigm enlisting pharmacists to transfer knowledge to both patients and prescribers in a 2-pronged approach to reduce inappropriate prescriptions, compared to usual care and 2) evaluate the transferability of the EMPOWER study concept to other classes of inappropriate prescriptions.
methodsWe intend to conduct a 3-year pragmatic cluster randomized parallel-group controlled trial to test the effect of the new de-prescribing intervention compared to usual care for reducing 4 classes of inappropriate prescriptions from the 2012 Beers criteria among 450 community-dwelling older adults with polypharmacy. Inappropriate prescriptions will include benzodiazepines, sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agents, first generation antihistamines and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The study population is community-dwelling older adults recruited from community pharmacies in Quebec, Canada. The intervention was developed based on a systematic review of the evidence for each medication. Participants in the experimental group will receive the written educational program following randomization and have their pharmacist send their physicians an evidence-based pharmaceutical opinion to recommend de-prescription and be followed for a year. The control group will be wait-listed for 6 months. DISCUSSION: System change to effectively reduce medication risk among community-dwelling seniors requires a coordinated approach targeting physicians, pharmacists and patients. This trial will test the feasibility and effectiveness of a tripartite approach to de-prescribing.
trial registrationRegistered via ClinicalTrials.gov on 31 January 2014, identifier: NCT02053194.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.