Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26058544›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2015

Adequacy of prenatal care among women living with human immunodeficiency virus: a population-based study.

Ryan Ng, Erin M Macdonald, Mona R Loutfy, Mark H Yudin, Janet Raboud, Khatundi-Irene Masinde, Ahmed M Bayoumi, Wangari E Tharao, Jason Brophy, Richard H Glazier and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Receipt of adequate prenatal care for privately sponsored versus government-assisted refugees in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan NgInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ryan.ng@ices.on.ca.
Erin M MacdonaldInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. erin.macdonald@ices.on.ca.
Mona R LoutfyInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. mona.loutfy@wchospital.ca.
Mark H YudinLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. yudinm@smh.ca.
Janet RaboudInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. janet@raboud.net.
Khatundi-Irene MasindeWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. miss_irene509@hotmail.com.
Ahmed M BayoumiInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ahmed.bayoumi@utoronto.ca.
Wangari E TharaoWomen's Health in Women's Hands Community Health Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. wangari@whiwh.com.
Jason BrophyChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario and University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. JBrophy@cheo.on.ca.
Richard H GlazierInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. rick.glazier@ices.on.ca.
Tony AntoniouInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. tantoniou@smh.ca.
Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAWomen's Health In Women's Hands · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal care reduces perinatal morbidity. However, there are no population-based studies examining the adequacy of prenatal care among women living with HIV. Accordingly, we compared the prevalence of adequate prenatal care among women living with and without HIV infection in Ontario, Canada.

methodsUsing administrative data in a universal single-payer setting, we determined the proportions of women initiating care in the first trimester and receiving adequate prenatal care according to the Revised-Graduated Prenatal Care Utilization Index . We also determined the proportion of women with HIV receiving adequate prenatal care by immigration status. We used generalized estimating equations with a logit link function to derive adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for all analyses.

resultsBetween April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2011, a total of 1,132,135 pregnancies were available for analysis, of which 634 (0.06%) were among women living with HIV. Following multivariable adjustment, women living with HIV were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (36.1% versus 43.3%; aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.88) or initiate prenatal care in the first trimester (50.8% versus 70.0%; aOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.60) than women without HIV. Among women with HIV, recent (i.e. ≤ 5 years) immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean were less likely to receive adequate prenatal care (25.5% versus 38.5%; adjusted odds ratio 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.81) than Canadian-born women.

conclusionDespite universal health care, disparities exist in the receipt of adequate prenatal care between women living with and without HIV. Interventions are required to ensure that women with HIV receive timely and adequate prenatal care.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultAfricaCanadaCaribbean RegionFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHIV SeropositivityHumansMiddle AgedOdds RatioOntarioPregnancyPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID26058544
PMCPMC4462120
OpenAlexW1607826512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.