Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26057384›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Comparative Analysis of Codon Usage Bias Patterns in Microsporidian Genomes.

Heng Xiang, Ruizhi Zhang, Robert R Butler, Tie Liu, Li Zhang, Jean-François Pombert, Zeyang Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative analysis of codon usage patterns in the chloroplast genomes of nine forage legumes.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Analysis of codon usage bias of chloroplast genomes inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The First Mitochondrial Genome ofFrontiers in fungal biology · 2021
    Article
  13. Hidden patterns of codon usage bias across kingdoms.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. F1000Research · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heng XiangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Ruizhi ZhangBiotechnology Research Center, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Robert R ButlerDepartment of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Tie LiuState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.
Li ZhangDepartment of Math and Information, China West Normal University, Nanchong, Sichuan 637000, China.
Jean-François PombertDepartment of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Zeyang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Silkworm Genome Biology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sub-3 Mbp genomes from microsporidian species of the Encephalitozoon genus are the smallest known among eukaryotes and paragons of genomic reduction and compaction in parasites. However, their diminutive stature is not characteristic of all Microsporidia, whose genome sizes vary by an order of magnitude. This large variability suggests that different evolutionary forces are applied on the group as a whole. In this study, we have compared the codon usage bias (CUB) between eight taxonomically distinct microsporidian genomes: Encephalitozoon intestinalis, Encephalitozoon cuniculi, Spraguea lophii, Trachipleistophora hominis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Nematocida parisii, Nosema bombycis and Nosema ceranae. While the CUB was found to be weak in all eight Microsporidia, nearly all (98%) of the optimal codons in S. lophii, T. hominis, E. bieneusi, N. parisii, N. bombycis and N. ceranae are fond of A/U in third position whereas most (64.6%) optimal codons in the Encephalitozoon species E. intestinalis and E. cuniculi are biased towards G/C. Although nucleotide composition biases are likely the main factor driving the CUB in Microsporidia according to correlation analyses, directed mutational pressure also likely affects the CUB as suggested by ENc-plots, correspondence and neutrality analyses. Overall, the Encephalitozoon genomes were found to be markedly different from the other microsporidians and, despite being the first sequenced representatives of this lineage, are uncharacteristic of the group as a whole. The disparities observed cannot be attributed solely to differences in host specificity and we hypothesize that other forces are at play in the lineage leading to Encephalitozoon species.

Indexed as

CodonEncephalitozoonEvolution, MolecularGenome, FungalHost SpecificityMicrosporidiaMutationCodon

Identifiers

PMID26057384
PMCPMC4461291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.