Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26057133›Full record

ArticleBiomaterials2015

The self-assembling camptothecin-tocopherol prodrug: An effective approach for formulating camptothecin.

Jianqin Lu, Chuang Liu, Pengcheng Wang, Mohammed Ghazwani, Jieni Xu, Yixian Huang, Xiaochao Ma, Peijun Zhang, Song Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Self-assembly of amino acids toward functional biomaterials.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianqin LuCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Chuang LiuDepartment of Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Pengcheng WangCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Mohammed GhazwaniCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Jieni XuCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Yixian HuangCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Xiaochao MaCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Peijun ZhangDepartment of Structural Biology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Song LiCenter for Pharmacogenetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA; University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA. Electronic address: sol4@pitt.edu.

Funding

Targeted Combination Therapy for Breast CancerR01CA174305 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LI, SONG · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Rational Design of Lipidic Vectors for Mitochondria-Targeted AntioxidantsR01GM102989 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LI, SONG · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Nanomicellar Formulation for Synergistic Targeting of Prostate CancerR21CA173887 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI LI, SONG · 2013 to 2014
$361k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA173887NCI NIH HHS R01 CA174305NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173887NCI NIH HHS R21CA173887NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM102989NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM102989
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camptothecin (CPT) is a potent antitumor agent and functions via inhibiting the activity of topoisomerase I during DNA replication. However, the clinical application of CPT has been greatly hindered by its extremely poor solubility, the instability of its active lactone ring in blood stream, as well as the non-specific toxicity to normal tissues. In addition, most of the formulations developed so far are not applicable for formulating CPT. In this study, two novel CPT prodrugs were developed by conjugating CPT to α-tocopherol via a carbonate ester bond (CPT-VE) or disulfide linkage (CPT-S-S-VE). Both CPT prodrugs were able to self-assemble into nanofibers with the facilitation of a PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2-based nanomicellar carrier. Both prodrug nanoassemblies exhibited excellent stability. Fluorescence quenching, UV absorbance, and FT-IR studies demonstrated strong interactions between carrier and prodrugs, including hydrophobic interaction, π-π stacking, as well as hydrogen bonding. NMR studies suggested that prodrugs were successfully incorporated into PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2 during self-assembly process. In vitro, PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2/CPT-S-S-VE presented significantly higher level of cytotoxicity on tumor cells compared to PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2/CPT-VE. Biodistribution study showed that CPT-S-S-VE formulated in PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2 micelles was effectively converted to parent CPT following delivery to tumor tissues. Finally, PEG5K-Fmoc-VE2/CPT-S-S-VE nanofibers showed superior tumor growth inhibition in an aggressive murine breast cancer model (4T1.2).

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCamptothecinCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDiffusionDrug CompoundingDrug StabilityDrug SynergismMiceNanocapsulesParticle SizeProdrugsTocopherolsTreatment OutcomeCamptothecinNanocapsulesProdrugsTocopherolsCamptothecinChemotherapyDisulfide-responsive releaseNanofibersTocopherol-based prodrug

Identifiers

PMID26057133
PMCPMC4470812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.