Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056842›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Preparing for the Rollout of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): A Vignette Survey to Identify Intended Sexual Behaviors among Women in Kenya and South Africa if Using PrEP.

Amy Corneli, Samuel Field, Emily Namey, Kawango Agot, Khatija Ahmed, Jacob Odhiambo, Joseph Skhosana, Greg Guest

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Amy CorneliSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Samuel FieldBiostatistics, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Emily NameySocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Kawango AgotImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Khatija AhmedSetshaba Research Centre, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jacob OdhiamboImpact Research and Development Organization, Kisumu, Kenya.
Joseph SkhosanaSetshaba Research Centre, Pretoria, South Africa.
Greg GuestSocial and Behavioral Health Sciences, FHI 360, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Family Health International 360 · USImpact Research and Development Organization · KESetshaba Research Centre · ZA

Funding

PrEP and Risk Compensation: Assessing Effect and Preparing for RolloutR01MH095531 · NIMH · FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL · PI CORNELI, AMY LYNN · 2011 to 2013
$1.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH095531NIMH NIH HHS R01MH095531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in reducing HIV risk. One concern with introducing PrEP is whether users will engage in riskier sexual behaviors.

methodsWe assessed the effect that PrEP may have on sexual risk behaviors by administering a survey to 799 women in Bondo, Kenya, and Pretoria, South Africa. Participants were asked about their sexual behavior intentions twice--once as if they were taking PrEP and once as if they were not taking PrEP--within four risk situations (vignettes). They responded using a 5-point ordinal scale. We used a series of linear mixed effects models with an unstructured residual covariance matrix to estimate the between- and within-subject differences in the mean likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behavior across the PrEP and non-PrEP contexts. We also calculated the total percentage of participants who reported a greater likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behavior if taking PrEP than if not taking PrEP, by vignette.

resultsWe found statistically significant differences in the mean likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behavior with the between-subject comparison (-0.17, p < 0.01) and with the within-subject comparison (-0.31, p < 0.001). Depending on the vignette, 27% to 40% of participants reported a greater likelihood of engaging in risky sexual behavior if taking PrEP than if not taking PrEP.

conclusionsOur findings indicate that modest increases in risky sexual behavior could occur with PrEP. Although responses from the majority of participants suggest they would not be more likely to engage in risky sexual behavior if they took PrEP, a substantial proportion might. Programs rolling out PrEP should be prepared to assist similar women in making informed choices about reducing their risk of HIV and about their sexual health beyond HIV prevention.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansKenyaPre-Exposure ProphylaxisRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID26056842
PMCPMC4461172
OpenAlexW1846410776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.