Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056838›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2015

Paravertebral Catheter for Three-Level Injection in Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Study.

Petchara Sundarathiti, Benno von Bormann, Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul, Panuwat Lertsithichai, Vanlapa Arnuntasupakul

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02065947 (Three-level Injection Paravertebral Block Using Paravertebral Catheter Compared to General Anesthesia in Mastectomy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02065947 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Three-level Injection Paravertebral Block Using Paravertebral Catheter Compared to General Anesthesia in Mastectomy Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorRamathibodi HospitalRan2013Enrolled60ConditionsRadical MastectomyArmsparavertebral block, fentanyl, propofol, atracurium, lidocaine , adrenaline, ketamine bolus, midazolam, catheter with 3-level-injection, sevoflurane and 50% oxygen in air
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petchara SundarathitiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Benno von BormannDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ronnarat SuvikapakornkulDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Panuwat LertsithichaiDepartment of Surgery, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Vanlapa ArnuntasupakulDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THRamathibodi Hospital · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParavertebral block (PVB) is an alternative to general anaesthesia (GA) for breast surgery. However, for extensive surgery multiple punctures are needed increasing the immanent risk of the method. The purpose of this study was to evaluate PVB via catheter and injections at three different levels. Primary outcome was the quality of postoperative analgesia, in particular, the number of patients requiring additional morphine.

methodsIn a randomised single blinded clinical study patients scheduled for breast surgery including axillary approach, were randomly allocated to different anaesthetic techniques, n = 35 each. Patients received either GA with sevoflurane or PVB with catheter at level Th 4. In PVB-patients a 1:2 mixture of bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 2% with adrenaline was injected sequentially 10 ml each at three different levels.

resultsComplication-free catheter insertion was possible in all 35 scheduled patients. The need for postoperative analgesics was higher after GA compared to PVB (22 vs.14 patients); p = 0.056. Postoperative morphine consumption was 1.55 (GA) and 0.26 mg (PVB) respectively (p < 0.001). Visual rating score (VRS) for pain at rest and at movement was higher in GA patients on post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as on the ward at 1-6 h and 6-12 h. Readiness for discharge was earlier after PVB (4.96 and 6.52 hours respectively). After GA the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was higher, though not significantly. Patients' satisfaction was comparable in both groups.

conclusionsThree-level injection PVB via catheter for extensive mastectomy was efficient and well accepted. Using a catheter may enhance safety by avoiding multiple paravertebral punctures when extended spread of analgesia is required.

trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrial.gov NCT02065947.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnesthesia, GeneralBupivacaineFemaleHumansInjectionsLidocaineMastectomy, RadicalMiddle AgedMorphineNerve BlockPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainProspective StudiesSingle-Blind MethodAnalgesicsBupivacaineLidocaineMorphine

Identifiers

PMID26056838
PMCPMC4461276
OpenAlexW2206169569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.