Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056583›Full record

ReviewMolecular and cellular therapies2014

Role of solute carriers in response to anticancer drugs.

Qing Li, Yan Shu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular and cellular therapies, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Impact of genetic variants in the solute carrier (Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Renal Organic Anion Transporters 1 and 3 In Vitro: Gone but Not Forgotten.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Soft Tissue Ewing Sarcoma Cell Drug Resistance Revisited: A Systems Biology Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Qing LiDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland USA ; Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410078 China.
Yan ShuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Maryland at Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

University of Maryland Center of Excellence in Regulatory Science and InnovationU01FD004320 · FDA · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BENTLEY, WILLIAM E., POLLI, JAMES E · 2011 to 2016
$3.8M
Xenobiotic Transporter Regulation and IRIP FunctionR01GM099742 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHU, YAN · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
FDA HHS U01 FD004320NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099742
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane transporters play critical roles in moving a variety of anticancer drugs across cancer cell membrane, thereby determining chemotherapy efficacy and/or toxicity. The retention of anticancer drugs in cancer cells is the result of net function of efflux and influx transporters. The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters are mainly the efflux transporters expressing at cancer cells, conferring the chemo-resistance in various malignant tumors, which has been well documented over the past decades. However, the function of influx transporters, in particular the solute carriers (SLC) in cancer cells, has only been recently well recognized to have significant impact on cancer therapy. The SLC transporters not only directly bring anticancer agents into cancer cells but also serve as the uptake mediators of essential nutrients for tumor growth and survival. In this review, we concentrate on the interaction of SLC transporters with anticancer drugs and nutrients, and their impact on chemo-sensitivity or -resistance of cancer cells. The differential expression patterns of SLC transporters between normal and tumor tissues may be well utilized to achieve specific delivery of chemotherapeutic agents.

Indexed as

Anticancer drugsChemoresistanceChemosensitivitySolute carriers (SLC)

Identifiers

PMID26056583
PMCPMC4452062
OpenAlexW2123523927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.