Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056567›Full record

ArticleMolecular and cellular therapies2013

Molecular and Cellular Therapies: New challenges and opportunities.

Xiangdong Wang, Dan Peer, Bryon Petersen

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and cellular therapies, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Fingerprints of Biomedical Science in Internal Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Xiangdong WangShanghai Institute of Respiratory Diseases; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fudan University Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, Sweden ; Institute of Clinical Science, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Dan PeerDepartment of Cell Research & Immunology, Laboratory of NanoMedicine, and the center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Bryon PetersenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Children Health Research Institute, Gainesville, FL USA.
Lund University · SETel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Florida Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy is suggested to be one of the most specific and efficient modulations for gene deficient diseases and extended to other diseases like cancer and inflammation, even though there are still challenges to be faced, such as specific and selective delivery, minimal to no toxicity, efficient metabolism, simplicity, and measurable efficiency. It is important to identify and validate drug-able disease-specific targets for molecular and cellular therapies, while it is equally important to have disease biomarkers to trace and define the biological effects of molecular and cellular therapies. The importance and significance of allostery in molecular and cellular therapies and "allosteric disease", "allosteric effect", and "allosteric drug" should be more carefully examined and validated. Cell therapy has been attracting an increasing amount of consideration in the development of new treatments for diseases. Molecular and Cellular Therapies (MCT) is a new, open-access journal, devoted to molecular mechanisms, preclinical and clinical research and development of gene-, peptide-, protein-, and cell-based therapies.

Indexed as

Cellular therapyDiseaseJournalMolecular therapy

Identifiers

PMID26056567
PMCPMC4448952
OpenAlexW2159254658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.