Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056468›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2015

Nonpharmacological therapies and provision of aids in outpatient dementia networks in Germany: utilization rates and associated factors.

Markus Wübbeler, Jochen René Thyrian, Bernhard Michalowsky, Johannes Hertel, Franziska Laporte Uribe, Karin Wolf-Ostermann, Susanne Schäfer-Walkmann, Wolfgang Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Markus WübbelerInterventional Health Care Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Jochen René ThyrianInterventional Health Care Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Bernhard MichalowskyGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Johannes HertelGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Franziska Laporte UribeImplementation and Dissemination Research Group, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Witten, Germany.
Karin Wolf-OstermannDepartment of Human and Health Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Susanne Schäfer-WalkmannInstitute for Applied Social Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany.
Wolfgang HoffmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Rostock/Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany ; Epidemiology of Health Care and Community Health, Institute for Community Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonpharmacological therapies and the provision of aids are described to be supportive in the treatment of persons with dementia (PWDs). These aim to maintain individuals' participation in daily activities as long as possible, to slow the progression of their disease, and to support their independent living at home. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the utilization of therapies and aids among community-dwelling PWDs.

objectiveThe aims of the study were a) to describe the utilization of nonpharmacological therapies and aids among community-dwelling PWDs and b) to analyze the factors associated with utilization.

methodAs part of a cross-sectional study of n=560 caregivers of PWDs in dementia networks throughout Germany, we assessed sociodemographics, clinical variables, and the utilization of nonpharmacological therapies (physiotherapy [PT], occupational therapy [OT]), and aids (sensory, mobility, and others), using face-to-face interviews and questionnaires.

resultsApproximately every fourth PWD received PT and every seventh PWD received OT. Sensory aids were utilized by 91.1%, personal hygiene aids by 77.2%, mobility aids by 58.6%, and medical aids by 57.7% of the sample. Regression analysis revealed that the utilization of PT and medical aids was associated with comorbidities (odds ratio [OR] 1.17 and OR 1.27, respectively) and that the utilization of OT and sensory aids was associated with age (OR 1.06 and OR 0.95, respectively).

conclusionThe utilization of nonpharmacological therapies and aids among community-dwelling people served by dementia networks is more frequent than that reported for people in other settings. This result indicates that PWDs in integrated care models such as dementia networks receive better health care.

Indexed as

aidcollaborative careintegrated care

Identifiers

PMID26056468
PMCPMC4445947
OpenAlexW2128327422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.