Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26056370›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Common cancer in a wild animal: the California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) as an emerging model for carcinogenesis.

Helen M Browning, Frances M D Gulland, John A Hammond, Kathleen M Colegrove, Ailsa J Hall

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cancer in wildlife: patterns of emergence.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2018
    Review
  16. Genetic diversity, inbreeding and cancer.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Peto's paradox and the promise of comparative oncology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen M BrowningSea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
Frances M D GullandThe Marine Mammal Center, 2000 Bunker Road, Sausalito, CA 94965, USA gullandf@tmmc.org.
John A HammondThe Pirbright Institute, Woking GU24 0NF, UK.
Kathleen M ColegroveZoological Pathology Program, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Ailsa J HallSea Mammal Research Unit, Scottish Oceans Institute, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK.
University of St Andrews · GBMarine Mammal Center · USThe Pirbright Institute · GBUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Naturally occurring cancers in non-laboratory species have great potential in helping to decipher the often complex causes of neoplasia. Wild animal models could add substantially to our understanding of carcinogenesis, particularly of genetic and environmental interactions, but they are currently underutilized. Studying neoplasia in wild animals is difficult and especially challenging in marine mammals owing to their inaccessibility, lack of exposure history, and ethical, logistical and legal limits on experimentation. Despite this, California sea lions (Zalophus californianus) offer an opportunity to investigate risk factors for neoplasia development that have implications for terrestrial mammals and humans who share much of their environment and diet. A relatively accessible California sea lion population on the west coast of the USA has a high prevalence of urogenital carcinoma and is regularly sampled during veterinary care in wildlife rehabilitation centres. Collaborative studies have revealed that genotype, persistent organic pollutants and a herpesvirus are all associated with this cancer. This paper reviews research to date on the epidemiology and pathogenesis of urogenital carcinoma in this species, and presents the California sea lion as an important and currently underexploited wild animal model of carcinogenesis.

Indexed as

Sea LionsAnimalsAnimals, WildCaliforniaCarcinogenesisDisease Models, AnimalEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene ExpressionGenes, p53HumansMaleReceptors, ProgesteroneRisk FactorsSpecies SpecificityUrogenital NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaReceptors, ProgesteroneCalifornia sea lioncontaminantsgeneticsherpesvirusurogenital carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID26056370
PMCPMC4581031
OpenAlexW2160919886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.