SynthesisBMJ open2015
Cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners in primary and specialised ambulatory care: systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Primary healthcare models for refugees involving nurses: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness of registered nurses on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2022Pooled it
- Economic evaluation of advanced practice physiotherapy models of care: a systematic review with meta-analyses.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Nurse practitioners and physician assistants working in ambulance care: A systematic review.F1000Research · 2020Pooled it
- Systematic review of the characteristics of brief team interventions to clarify roles and improve functioning in healthcare teams.PloS one · 2020Pooled it
- Nurses as substitutes for doctors in primary care.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Nurse Practitioner-Physician Comanagement: A Theoretical Model to Alleviate Primary Care Strain.Annals of family medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Nurse practitioner-physician comanagement of primary care patients: The promise of a new delivery care model to improve quality of care.Health care management reviewPooled it
- Chronic pain management for older adults in ambulatory care : Results of a randomized pragmatic trial in Berlin, Germany.Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2025Trial
- The effect of nurse practitioner (NP-led) care on health-related quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis - a randomized trial.BMC neurology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- The impact of substituting general practitioners with nurse practitioners on resource use, production and health-care costs during out-of-hours: a quasi-experimental study.BMC family practice · 2016Trial
- Flight Forward or Rational Adaptation? Nurse Prescribing Through Herbert Simon's The Sciences of the Artificial.Nursing inquiry · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a questionnaire measuring healthcare professionals' individual perceptions of advanced practice nurses' contributions to team functioning: a modified international Delphi approach.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- 'Navigating the uncharted waters'- Transition experiences of novice advanced practice nurses in China: a descriptive phenomenological study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Global Economic Evaluation of the Nurse Prescribing of Medication Role: A Scoping Review.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction with the Expanded Nurses Service in Primary Health Care: Evidence from Kazakhstan.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Nurse Practitioner Care Delivery Models: Meeting the Rapidly Expanding Needs of Cancer Patients.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Scope of practice of primary care nurses: a protocol for an umbrella review of international literature.BMJ open · 2025Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the cost-effectiveness of nurse practitioners delivering primary and specialised ambulatory care.
designA systematic review of randomised controlled trials reported since 1980. DATA SOURCES: 10 electronic bibliographic databases, handsearches, contact with authors, bibliographies and websites. INCLUDED STUDIES: Randomised controlled trials that evaluated nurse practitioners in alternative and complementary ambulatory care roles and reported health system outcomes.
results11 trials were included. In four trials of alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but seven patient outcomes favouring nurse practitioner care and in all but four health system outcomes, one favouring nurse practitioner care and three favouring physician care. In a meta-analysis of two studies (2689 patients) with minimal heterogeneity and high-quality evidence, nurse practitioner care resulted in lower mean health services costs per consultation (mean difference: -€6.41; 95% CI -€9.28 to -€3.55; p<0.0001) (2006 euros). In two trials of alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles, nurse practitioners were equivalent to physicians in all but three patient outcomes and one health system outcome favouring nurse practitioner care. In five trials of complementary provider specialised ambulatory care roles, 16 patient/provider outcomes favouring nurse practitioner plus usual care, and 16 were equivalent. Two health system outcomes favoured nurse practitioner plus usual care, four favoured usual care and 14 were equivalent. Four studies of complementary specialised ambulatory care compared costs, but only one assessed costs and outcomes jointly.
conclusionsNurse practitioners in alternative provider ambulatory primary care roles have equivalent or better patient outcomes than comparators and are potentially cost-saving. Evidence for their cost-effectiveness in alternative provider specialised ambulatory care roles is promising, but limited by the few studies. While some evidence indicates nurse practitioners in complementary specialised ambulatory care roles improve patient outcomes, their cost-effectiveness requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.