Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26055974›Full record

SynthesisHealth research policy and systems2015

Approaches and impact of non-academic research capacity strengthening training models in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.

Lambert Mugabo, Dominique Rouleau, Jackline Odhiambo, Marie Paul Nisingizwe, Cheryl Amoroso, Peter Barebwanuwe, Christine Warugaba, Lameck Habumugisha, Bethany L Hedt-Gauthier

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health research policy and systems, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Building research capacity through "Planning for Success".PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lambert MugaboPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. lambertmugabo@gmail.com.
Dominique RouleauPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. dominique.rouleau@gmail.com.
Jackline OdhiamboPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. ojacklineatieno@gmail.com.
Marie Paul NisingizwePartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. nisimariepaul@gmail.com.
Cheryl AmorosoPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. cheryl.amoroso@gmail.com.
Peter BarebwanuwePartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. barebwa@gmail.com.
Christine WarugabaPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. chrisw1093@gmail.com.
Lameck HabumugishaPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. habumugisha4@gmail.com.
Bethany L Hedt-GauthierPartners In Health-Inshuti Mu Buzima, P.O. Box 3432, Kigali, Rwanda. bethhedt@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch is essential to identify and prioritize health needs and to develop appropriate strategies to improve health outcomes. In the last decade, non-academic research capacity strengthening trainings in sub-Saharan Africa, coupled with developing research infrastructure and the provision of individual mentorship support, has been used to build health worker skills. The objectives of this review are to describe different training approaches to research capacity strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa outside academic programs, assess methods used to evaluate research capacity strengthening activities, and learn about the challenges facing research capacity strengthening and the strategies/innovations required to overcome them. METHODOLOGY: The PubMed database was searched using nine search terms and articles were included if 1) they explicitly described research capacity strengthening training activities, including information on program duration, target audience, immediate program outputs and outcomes; 2) all or part of the training program took place in sub-Saharan African countries; 3) the training activities were not a formal academic program; 4) papers were published between 2000 and 2013; and 5) both abstract and full paper were available in English.

resultsThe search resulted in 495 articles, of which 450 were retained; 14 papers met all inclusion criteria and were included and analysed. In total, 4136 people were trained, of which 2939 were from Africa. Of the 14 included papers, six fell in the category of short-term evaluation period and eight in the long-term evaluation period. Conduct of evaluations and use of evaluation frameworks varied between short and long term models and some trainings were not evaluated. Evaluation methods included tests, surveys, interviews, and systems approach matrix.

conclusionsResearch capacity strengthening activities in sub-Saharan Africa outside of academic settings provide important contributions to developing in-country capacity to participate in and lead research. Institutional support, increased funds, and dedicated time for research activities are critical factors that lead to the development of successful programs. Further, knowledge sharing through scientific articles with sufficient detail is needed to enable replication of successful models in other settings.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingOrganizationsAfrica South of the SaharaBiomedical ResearchHumansResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID26055974
PMCPMC4464866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.