Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26055479›Full record

ArticleNanoscale research letters2015

Optical Properties of Pyrolytic Carbon Films Versus Graphite and Graphene.

Galyna I Dovbeshko, Volodymyr R Romanyuk, Denys V Pidgirnyi, Vsevolod V Cherepanov, Eugene O Andreev, Vadim M Levin, Polina P Kuzhir, Tommi Kaplas, Yuri P Svirko

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanoscale research letters, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transient Absorption Spectroscopy of Films: Impact of Refractive Index.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Review
  2. Long-Lived Photo-Response of Multi-Layer N-Doped Graphene-Based Films.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2023
    Article
  3. Tunable Electronic Properties of Two-Dimensional GaSeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Magnetic control of graphitic microparticles in aqueous solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Galyna I DovbeshkoInstitute of Physics of NAS of Ukraine, Prospect Nauki 46, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine, gd@iop.kiev.ua.
Volodymyr R Romanyuk
Denys V Pidgirnyi
Vsevolod V Cherepanov
Eugene O Andreev
Vadim M Levin
Polina P Kuzhir
Tommi Kaplas
Yuri P Svirko
Institute of Physics · UAUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIBelarusian State University · BYInstitute of Biochemical Physics NM Emanuel · RUV.E. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics · UA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report a comparative study of optical properties of 5-20 nm thick pyrolytic carbon (PyC) films, graphite, and graphene. The complex dielectric permittivity of PyC is obtained by measuring polarization-sensitive reflectance and transmittance spectra of the PyC films deposited on silica substrate. The Lorentz-Drude model describes well the general features of the optical properties of PyC from 360 to 1100 nm. By comparing the obtained results with literature data for graphene and highly ordered pyrolytic graphite, we found that in the visible spectral range, the effective dielectric permittivity of the ultrathin PyC films are comparable with those of graphite and graphene.

Identifiers

PMID26055479
PMCPMC4456585
OpenAlexW1579092910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.