Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26055253›Full record

Observational studyKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2017

Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.

Bert Boonen, Martijn G M Schotanus, Bart Kerens, Frans-Jan Hulsmans, Wim E Tuinebreijer, Nanne P Kort

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Preliminary experience with an image-free handheld robot for total knee arthroplasty: 77 cases compared with a matched control group.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Patient-specific positioning guides do not consistently achieve the planned implant position in UKA.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bert BoonenDepartment of Orthopaedics, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX, Maastricht, The Netherlands. boonenbert@gmail.com.
Martijn G M SchotanusDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orbis Medical Centre, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Bart KerensDepartment of Orthopaedics, AZ Sint-Maarten, Leopoldstraat 2, 2800, Mechelen, Belgium.
Frans-Jan HulsmansDepartment of Radiology, Orbis Medical Centre, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Wim E TuinebreijerDepartment of Surgery-Traumatology, Erasmus MC, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nanne P KortDepartment of Orthopaedics, Orbis Medical Centre, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, 6162 BG, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Zuyderland Medisch Centrum · NLAZ Sint-Lucas · BEErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess whether there is a significant difference between the alignment of the individual femoral and tibial components (in the frontal, sagittal and horizontal planes) as calculated pre-operatively (digital plan) and the actually achieved alignment in vivo obtained with the use of patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs) for TKA. It was hypothesised that there would be no difference between post-op implant position and pre-op digital plan.

methodsTwenty-six patients were included in this non-inferiority trial. Software permitted matching of the pre-operative MRI scan (and therefore calculated prosthesis position) to a pre-operative CT scan and then to a post-operative full-leg CT scan to determine deviations from pre-op planning in all three anatomical planes.

resultsFor the femoral component, mean absolute deviations from planning were 1.8° (SD 1.3), 2.5° (SD 1.6) and 1.6° (SD 1.4) in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes, respectively. For the tibial component, mean absolute deviations from planning were 1.7° (SD 1.2), 1.7° (SD 1.5) and 3.2° (SD 3.6) in the frontal, sagittal and transverse planes, respectively. Absolute mean deviation from planned mechanical axis was 1.9°. The a priori specified null hypothesis for equivalence testing: the difference from planning is >3 or <-3 was rejected for all comparisons except for the tibial transverse plane.

conclusionPSPG was able to adequately reproduce the pre-op plan in all planes, except for the tibial rotation in the transverse plane. Possible explanations for outliers are discussed and highlight the importance for adequate training surgeons before they start using PSPG in their day-by-day practise. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prospective cohort study, Level II.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisRotationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior Cruciate LigamentArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCohort StudiesFemaleFemurHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPatient PositioningPostoperative Period3D CT scanAccuracyAlignmentPatient-specific positioning guidesTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID26055253
PMCPMC5570763
OpenAlexW2113096144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.