Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26055135›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2015

Extended Versus Standard Lymphadenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Bobby V M Dasari, Sandro Pasquali, Ravinder S Vohra, Andrew M Smith, Mark A Taylor, Robert P Sutcliffe, Paolo Muiesan, Keith J Roberts, John Isaac, Darius F Mirza

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Surgical management of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a narrative review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. [Surgery for periampullary pancreatic cancer].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Multidisciplinary consensus statement on the clinical management of patients with pancreatic cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  14. [Surgery of pancreatic cancer: techniques to avoid local recurrence].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Local radicality and survival outcome of pancreatic cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  18. Management of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma: From where to where?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2019
    Review
  19. Optimizing the outcomes of pancreatic cancer surgery.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
  20. Prognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with pancreatic cancer.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bobby V M DasariDepartment of HPB and Liver Transplantation Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2WB, UK, bobby.dasari@yahoo.com.
Sandro Pasquali
Ravinder S Vohra
Andrew M Smith
Mark A Taylor
Robert P Sutcliffe
Paolo Muiesan
Keith J Roberts
John Isaac
Darius F Mirza
Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBMater Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe evidence for improved prognostic assessment and long-term survival for extended pancreatoduodenectomy (EPD) compared to standard pancreatoduodenectomy (SPD) in patients with carcinoma of the head of the pancreas has not been considered from only randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

methodsThe aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes comparing SPD and EPD in RCTs. Searches were performed on MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases using MeSH keyword combinations: 'pancreatic cancer', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy', 'extended', 'randomized' and 'lymphadenectomy'. RCTs published up to 2014 were included. Overall post-operative survival, morbidity, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay were the outcomes assessed.

resultsFive eligible RCTs with 546 participants were included (EPD = 276 and SPD = 270). EPD was associated with a significantly higher number of excised lymph nodes (LNs) compared to SPD (mean difference = 15.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 9.41-22.04; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 88%). LN metastasis was detected in 58-68 and 55-70% of patients who had EPD and SPD, respectively. EPD did not improve overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.75-1.03; P = 0.11) but did worsen post-operative morbidity compared to SPD (risk ratio (RR) = 1.23; 95% CI = 1.01-1.50; P = 0.004; I(2) = 9%). There were no differences in the 30-day mortality (RR = 0.81; 95% CI = 0.32-2.06; P = 0.66; I(2) = 0%) or length of hospital stay (mean difference = 1.39, 95% CI = -2.31 to 5.09; P = 0.46; I(2) = 67%).

conclusionSPD is associated with reduced morbidity, but equivalent long-term benefits compared to patients undergoing EPD.

Indexed as

Lymph Node ExcisionPancreaticoduodenectomyCarcinomaHumansPancreatic NeoplasmsPrognosisRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26055135
OpenAlexW583610353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.