Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054884›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2015

Neurotrophin selectivity in organizing topographic regeneration of nociceptive afferents.

Lakshmi Kelamangalath, Xiaoqing Tang, Kathleen Bezik, Noelle Sterling, Young-Jin Son, George M Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Microglia: sculptors of neuropathic pain?Royal Society open science · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Multiple uses of fibrin sealant for nervous system treatment following injury and disease.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lakshmi KelamangalathShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Xiaoqing TangShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Kathleen BezikShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Noelle SterlingShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Young-Jin SonShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
George M SmithShriners Hospitals Pediatric Research Center, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA. Electronic address: george.smith@temple.edu.
Temple University · US

Funding

BIORESORBABLE MICROFILAMENTS FOR NERVOUS SYSTEM REPAIRR01NS040592 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, GEORGE M · 2000 to 2009
$2.7M
GENE THERAPY FOR SPINAL CORD REGENERATIONR01NS038126 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SW MED CTR/DALLAS · PI SMITH, GEORGE M · 1999 to 2006
$1.7M
Reconstruction of the Nigrostriatal pathwayR01NS060784 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI SMITH, GEORGE M · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038126NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS040592NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060784
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurotrophins represent some of the best candidates to enhance regeneration. In the current study, we investigated the effects of artemin, a member of the glial derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) family, on sensory axon regeneration following a lumbar dorsal root injury and compared these effects with that observed after either NGF or GDNF expression in the rat spinal cord. Unlike previously published data, artemin failed to induce regeneration of large-diameter myelinated sensory afferents when expressed within either the spinal cord or DRG. However, artemin or NGF induced regeneration of calcitonin gene related peptide positive (CGRP(+)) axons only when expressed within the spinal cord. Accordingly, artemin or NGF enhanced recovery of only nociceptive behavior and showed a cFos distribution similar to the topography of regenerating axons. Artemin and GDNF signaling requires binding to different co-receptors (GFRα3 or GFRα1, respectively) prior to binding to the signaling receptor, cRet. Approximately 70% of DRG neurons express cRet, but only 35% express either co-receptor. To enhance artemin-induced regeneration, we co-expressed artemin with either GFRα3 or GDNF. Co-expression of artemin and GFRα3 only slightly enhanced regeneration of IB4(+) non-peptidergic nociceptive axons, but not myelinated axons. Interestingly, this co-expression also disrupted the ability of artemin to produce topographic targeting and lead to significant increases in cFos immunoreactivity within the deep dorsal laminae. This study failed to demonstrate artemin-induced regeneration of myelinated axons, even with co-expression of GFRα3, which only promoted mistargeted regeneration.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAfferent PathwaysAnimalsCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCholera ToxinDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGanglia, SpinalHyperalgesiaLectinsNerve Growth FactorNerve RegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsNociceptorsPain MeasurementPain ThresholdAdjuvants, ImmunologicArtn protein, ratCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCholera ToxinLectinsNerve Growth FactorNerve Tissue ProteinsArteminAxonal guidanceRegenerationSensory system

Identifiers

PMID26054884
PMCPMC5090981
OpenAlexW627045417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.