Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054766›Full record

ArticleBioTechniques2015

Combined in vitro transcription and reverse transcription to amplify and label complex synthetic oligonucleotide probe libraries.

Yusuf Murgha, Brian Beliveau, Kassandra Semrau, Donald Schwartz, Chao-Ting Wu, Erdogan Gulari, Jean-Marie Rouillard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioTechniques, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bulked Oligo-FISH for Chromosome Painting and Chromosome Barcoding.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Whole-chromosome paints in maize reveal rearrangements, nuclear domains, and chromosomal relationships.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. OligoMiner provides a rapid, flexible environment for the design of genome-scale oligonucleotide in situ hybridization probes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yusuf MurghaMYcroarray, Ann Arbor, MI.
Brian BeliveauDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Kassandra SemrauMYcroarray, Ann Arbor, MI.
Donald SchwartzMYcroarray, Ann Arbor, MI.
Chao-Ting WuDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Erdogan GulariMYcroarray, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jean-Marie RouillardMYcroarray, Ann Arbor, MI.
MYcroarray (United States) · USHarvard University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

The inheritance of position: It's not just who you are, it's where you areDP1GM106412 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI WU, CHAO-TING · 2012 to 2016
$4.2M
Custom Oligonucleotide Libraries synthesisR43GM093579 · NIGMS · BIODISCOVERY, LLC · PI ROUILLARD, JEAN-MARIE · 2010 to 2010
$215k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R43GM093579NIGMS NIH HHS DP1 GM106412NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM093579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oligonucleotide microarrays allow the production of complex custom oligonucleotide libraries for nucleic acid detection-based applications such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). We have developed a PCR-free method to make single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) fluorescent probes through an intermediate RNA library. A double-stranded oligonucleotide library is amplified by transcription to create an RNA library. Next, dye- or hapten-conjugate primers are used to reverse transcribe the RNA to produce a dye-labeled cDNA library. Finally the RNA is hydrolyzed under alkaline conditions to obtain the single-stranded fluorescent probes library. Starting from unique oligonucleotide library constructs, we present two methods to produce single-stranded probe libraries. The two methods differ in the type of reverse transcription (RT) primer, the incorporation of fluorescent dye, and the purification of fluorescent probes. The first method employs dye-labeled reverse transcription primers to produce multiple differentially single-labeled probe subsets from one microarray library. The fluorescent probes are purified from excess primers by oligonucleotide-bead capture. The second method uses an RNA:DNA chimeric primer and amino-modified nucleotides to produce amino-allyl probes. The excess primers and RNA are hydrolyzed under alkaline conditions, followed by probe purification and labeling with amino-reactive dyes. The fluorescent probes created by the combination of transcription and reverse transcription can be used for FISH and to detect any RNA and DNA targets via hybridization.

Indexed as

Gene LibraryReverse TranscriptionBase SequenceCell LineDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedFluorescent DyesHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOligonucleotide ProbesRNATranscription, GeneticDNA PrimersDNA, Single-StrandedFluorescent DyesOligonucleotide ProbesRNAfluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)in vitro transcription (IVT)microarraysoligonucleotide library poolsOligopaint FISH probesreverse transcription (RT)single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) libraries

Identifiers

PMID26054766
PMCPMC4949592
OpenAlexW2408328039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.