Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054505›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2015

French Multicenter Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Admission to the Emergency Department of the Over-80s.

E Menand, E Lenain, C Lazarovici, G Chatellier, O Saint-Jean, D Somme, A Corvol

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact and experiences of delayed discharge: A mixed-studies systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Reliability and Validity of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol for Public Hospitals in Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Identification of appropriate and potentially avoidable emergency department referrals in a tertiary cancer care center.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

E MenandE. Menand, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France, Emilie.MENAND@chu-rennes.fr.
E Lenain
C Lazarovici
G Chatellier
O Saint-Jean
D Somme
A Corvol
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRUniversité de Rennes · FRCentre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRHôpital Paul-Brousse · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons over 80 represents 40% of patients in French emergency services. We assessed the appropriateness of these admissions and sought to identify risk factors for inappropriate hospital stays.

methodsThe appropriateness of admission was assessed in a prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study in eight hospitals in France by means of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (French version, AEPf) during two non-consecutive periods of four weeks in 2010. We analyzed admission of patients aged 80 and over who were admitted to the hospital after a stay in the emergency department of the same hospital. Demographics and morbidity factors were recorded as were administrative hospitalization data to identify risk factors associated with inappropriate admissions. We also evaluated the economic impact of inappropriate admissions. For cost analysis, all variables were obtained from anonymized hospital reports of a diagnosis-related group system used for funding of the hospitals by health insurance.

resultsDuring two different periods, 1577 patients were included. 139 (8.8%) hospital admissions were inappropriate according to explicit criteria of the AEPf, but 18 of these (1.1%) were in fact considered appropriate by the physician responsible for the admission, leading to 121 (7.7%) inappropriate admissions. Multivariate logistic regression showed that patients with heart disease were less often subject to inappropriate admission (odds ratio OR= 0.36 [0.23; 0.56], p < 0.001), as also were patients who usually lived in a nursing home (OR = 0.53 [0.30; 0.87], p = 0.018) and patients with higher Acute Physiology Scores (OR = 0.97 [0.95; 0.99], p < 0.001). Inappropriate admission increased when patients had a syndrome as the main diagnosis (OR = 1.81 [1.81; 2.83], p = 0.010). By contrast, cognitive functions, gait and balance disturbance or falls, behavioral disorders and method of transport to the emergency department did not change the probability of inappropriateness. The median cost of the hospital stay of an older patient was 3 606.5 [2 498.1; 4 994.2] euros for inappropriate admissions.

conclusionInappropriate emergency admissions of older patients were infrequent. None of the geriatric syndromes were linked with the phenomenon and principle causes were severity of illness, mention of a cardiac disease, unclear pattern of consultation and institutionalized way of life.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCosts and Cost AnalysisCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis-Related GroupsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHeart DiseasesHospitalizationHospitalsHumansInsurance, HealthLength of StayLogistic Models

Identifiers

PMID26054505
PMCPMC12877648
OpenAlexW2036252184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.