Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054497›Full record

ArticleThe journal of nutrition, health & aging2015

Self- Perception of Body Weight Status in Older Dutch Adults.

C Monteagudo, S C Dijkstra, M Visser

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of nutrition, health & aging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Misclassification of Self-Reported Body Mass Index Categories.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Views of Own Body Weight and the Perceived Risks of Developing Obesity and NCDs in South African Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C MonteagudoDr. Celia Monteagudo S´nchez, Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain, Phone: 34-958-242841, Fax: 34-958-249577, e-mail: celiams@ugr.es.
S C Dijkstra
M Visser
EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research · NLUniversidad de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction

objectivesThe prevalence of obesity is highest in older persons and a correct self-perception of body weight status is necessary for optimal weight control. The aim of this study was to determine self-perception of, and satisfaction with, body weight status, and to compare current versus ideal body image in a large, nationally representative sample of older people. Furthermore, determinants of misperception were explored.

designA cross-sectional study.

settingThe Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA), conducted in a population-based sample in the Netherlands.

participants1295 men and women aged 60-96 years. MEASUREMENTS: Body weight status was assessed using measured weight and height. Self-perceived body weight status, satisfaction with body weight and current and ideal body image were also assessed. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the association of age, educational level and objectively measured BMI with underestimation of body weight status.

resultsThe prevalence of obesity was 19.9% in men and 29.3% in women. The agreement between objective and self-perceived body weight status was low (Kappa < 0.2). Among overweight and obese persons, 42.1% of men and 44.1% of women were (very) dissatisfied with their body weight status and >99% of obese participants desired to be thinner (ideal body image < current image). Only 4.4% of obese men and 12.3% of obese women perceived their body weight status correctly. Higher age (women), lower educational level (men) and higher BMI (all) were associated with greater underestimation of body weight status.

conclusionMany older persons misperceive their body weight status. Future actions to improve body weight perception in older persons are necessary to increase the impact of public health campaigns focussing on a healthy body weight in old age.

Indexed as

Body WeightPersonal SatisfactionSelf ConceptAgedAged, 80 and overBody ImageBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth EducationHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID26054497
PMCPMC12877609
OpenAlexW2028968299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.