Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054386›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2015

Stage-specific frequency and prognostic significance of aneuploidy in patients with sporadic colorectal cancer--a meta-analysis and current overview.

Tilman Laubert, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Michael Linnebacher, Alexandra König, Brigitte Vollmar, Jens K Habermann, North German Tumorbank of Colorectal Cancer (ColoNet) consortium

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. PARP1 Suppression Drives ROS Resistance in Aneuploid Cancer Cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Benchmarking Ploidy Estimation Methods for Bulk and Single-Cell Whole Genome Sequencing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Defining the Comprehensive Genomic Landscapes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Using Real-World Endoscopic Aspiration Samples.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Observational
  11. Context is everything: aneuploidy in cancer.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Stress-Inducible PeroxidaseG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tilman LaubertSection of Translational Surgical Oncology and Biobanking, Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck and University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 16, 23538, Lübeck, Germany.
Sandra Freitag-Wolf
Michael Linnebacher
Alexandra König
Brigitte Vollmar
Jens K Habermann
North German Tumorbank of Colorectal Cancer (ColoNet) consortium
University Medical Center · USUniversity of Rostock · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAneuploidy has long been suggested as an independent prognostic marker for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and could thus aid for individualized medicine. However, due to a large spectrum of deviating studies, expert panels do not recommend ploidy assessment. In order to clarify a potential bias of stage-specific frequency of aneuploidy, we now conducted a meta-analysis combined with a systematic review regarding aneuploidy and prognosis.

methodsA systematic, web-based search process retrieved 1935 studies published in English between 1990 and 2011. The defined endpoint for the meta-analysis was an increase in aneuploidy frequency between early- (Dukes A, B and UICC I, II; n = 3632 samples) and late-stage (Dukes C, D and UICC III, IV; n = 3440 samples) colorectal carcinomas.

resultsOf 1935 studies initially identified, 17 image (2130 patients) and 20 (7023 patients) flow cytometric studies were analyzed in detail. The meta-analysis (7072 patients) revealed late-stage CRC to be more frequently aneuploid than early-stage CRC (odds ratio 1.51, 95 % CI 1.37-1.67; p = 0.0007). Independent of tumor stage, the overall range of aneuploidy was 39 to 81 % (median 58 %), and altogether, 21 (54.1 %) studies described a significant prognostic impact of aneuploidy for overall, disease-specific, and recurrence-free survival, respectively.

conclusionsA substantial number of studies showed a prognostic importance of aneuploidy in CRC. Furthermore, the higher frequency of aneuploidy in late-stage CRC implies an increase in genomic instability with CRC progression, indicating aneuploidy to be also a stage-specific prognostic marker.

Indexed as

AneuploidyColorectal NeoplasmsFlow CytometryHumansNeoplasm StagingOdds RatioPrognosisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID26054386
OpenAlexW617460480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.