Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054385›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2015

Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies.

M F Sier, L van Gelder, D T Ubbink, W A Bemelman, R J Oostenbroek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prosthetic mesh placement for the prevention of parastomal herniation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. The rate of ileostomy site incisional hernias: more common than we think?Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: A retrospective cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

M F SierDepartment of Surgery, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Location Dordwijk, Room: W0-051, Albert Schweitzerplaats 25, 3318 AT, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, m.f.sier@asz.nl.
L van Gelder
D T Ubbink
W A Bemelman
R J Oostenbroek

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough stoma closure is considered a simple surgical intervention, the interval between construction and reversal is often prolonged, and some ileostomies may never be reversed. We evaluated possible predictors for non-reversal and prolonged interval between construction and reversal. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn a cohort study of ileostomy patients treated in a large teaching hospital, we collected data from the surgical complication and enterostomal therapists' registries between January 2001 and December 2011. Parameters responsible for morbidity, mortality, length of stay and time interval between construction and reversal were analysed.

resultsOf 485 intentionally temporary ileostomies, 359 were reversed after a median of 5.6 months (IQR 3.8-8.9 months), while 126 (26%) remained permanent. End ileostomy and intra-abdominal abscess independently delayed reversal. Age, end ileostomy, higher body mass index and preoperative radiotherapy were independent factors for non-reversal. Median duration of hospitalisation for reversal was 7.0 days (5-13 days). Morbidity and mortality were 31 and 0.9%, respectively. In 20 patients (5.5%), re-ileostomy was necessary.

conclusionsA substantial number of ileostomies that are intended to be temporary will never be reversed. If reversed, the interval between construction and reversal is longer than anticipated, while morbidity after reversal and duration of hospitalisation are considerable. Besides a temporary ileostomy, there are two other options: no diversion or a permanent colostomy. Shared decision-making is to be preferred in these situations.

Indexed as

Abdominal AbscessAbdominal Wound Closure TechniquesAgedAge FactorsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansIleostomyIntestinal DiseasesLongevityMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyProbabilityRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID26054385
PMCPMC4553149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.