ArticleBMC biotechnology2015
A folded and immunogenic IgE-hyporeactive variant of the major allergen Phl p 1 produced in Escherichia coli.
Article in BMC biotechnology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recent Developments in Bioprocessing of Recombinant Proteins: Expression Hosts and Process Development.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Sophisticated Cloning, Fermentation, and Purification Technologies for an Enhanced Therapeutic Protein Production: A Review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGroup 1 grass pollen allergens are a major cause of allergic disease. Specific immunotherapy involving controlled administration of allergens can be used as a disease-modifying treatment for such disease. Recombinant allergen variants with reduced IgE binding capacity may be used as component in such vaccines, as they may induce fewer treatment side effects than materials currently in use. A mutated variant of the immunodominant C-terminal domain of the group 1 grass pollen allergen Phl p 1 was recently established through an approach that used a set of human monoclonal IgE as a guide to identify mutations that disturbed IgE-allergen interactions. Further analysis of this domain is required to establish its potential for use in treatment.
methodsGST-tagged wild-type and mutated C-terminal domains of Phl p 1 were produced in Escherichia coli TUNER(DE3). The products were purified by affinity chromatography on immobilized glutathione. GST was removed by enzymatic cleavage and tag-free products were purified by size exclusion chromatography. Products were assessed by SDS-PAGE, circular dichroism spectroscopy, differential scanning fluorimetry and dynamic light scattering. Rats were immunized with GST-tagged and tag-free mutated C-terminal domain of Phl p 1. Antigen-binding properties of induced antibodies were assessed by immunochemical analysis.
resultsThe mutated domain has a structure very similar to that of the wild-type domain as determined by circular dichroism, but a reduced thermal stability. Immunization of rats demonstrates that this IgE-hyporeactive domain, despite its three sequence modifications (K8A, N11A, D55A), is able to induce antibodies that substantially block the binding of allergic subjects' IgE to the wild-type allergen.
conclusionsIt is concluded that this IgE-hyporeactive molecule can be produced in folded form and that it is able to induce an antibody response that efficiently competes with IgE recognition of Phl p 1. These findings suggest that it, or a further evolved variant thereof, is a candidate for use as a component in specific immunotherapy against grass pollen allergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.