Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054337›Full record

ReviewBMC anesthesiology2015

Prophylactic plasma and platelet transfusion in the critically Ill patient: just useless and expensive or even harmful?

Klaus Görlinger, Fuat H Saner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC anesthesiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03598907 (Point-of-care), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03598907 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Point-of-care (POC) Approach to Management of Coagulopathy in Lung Transplantation Versus Standard Approach and Their Effect on Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), Randomized Controlled Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MotolRan2018 to 2020Enrolled100ConditionsLung TransplantationArmsFresh frozen plasma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of Thromboelastometry in Sepsis in Correlation With Bleeding During Invasive Procedures.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis · 2018
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Viscoelastic tests in liver disease: where do we stand now?World journal of gastroenterology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. A new era of thromboelastometry.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Klaus GörlingerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. klaus@goerlinger.net.
Fuat H SanerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. fuat.saner@uni-due.de.
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is still common practice to correct abnormal standard laboratory test results, such as increased INR or low platelet count, prior to invasive interventions, such as tracheostomy, central venous catheter insertion or liver biopsy, in critically ill patients. Data suggest that 30-90 % of plasma transfused for these indications is unnecessary and puts the patient at risk. Plasma transfusion is associated with a high risk of transfusion-associated adverse events such as transfusion-associated circulatory overload (TACO), transfusion-related lung injury (TRALI), transfusion-related immunomodulation (TRIM), and anaphylaxis/allergic reactions. Therefore, the avoidance of inappropriate plasma transfusion bears a high potential of improving patient outcomes. The prospective study by Durila et al., published recently in BMC Anesthesiology, provides evidence that tracheostomies can be performed without prophylactic plasma transfusion and bleeding complications in critically ill patients despite increased INR in case of normal thromboelastometry (ROTEM) results. Thromboelastometry-based restrictive transfusion management helped avoid unnecessary plasma and platelet transfusion, and should reduce the incidence of transfusion-related adverse events and transfusion-associated hospital costs. Therefore, the authors believe that thromboelastometry-based strategies should be implemented to optimize patient blood management in perioperative medicine.

Indexed as

PlasmaCritical IllnessHumansPlatelet TransfusionPre-Exposure ProphylaxisThrombelastography

Identifiers

PMID26054337
PMCPMC4556318
OpenAlexW1535497359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.