Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26054058›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2015

Ballistocardiogram as Proximal Timing Reference for Pulse Transit Time Measurement: Potential for Cuffless Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Chang-Sei Kim, Andrew M Carek, Ramakrishna Mukkamala, Omer T Inan, Jin-Oh Hahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chang-Sei Kim
Andrew M Carek
Ramakrishna Mukkamala
Omer T Inan
Jin-Oh Hahn

Funding

Unobtrusive and Affordable Blood Pressure Monitoring Via Pulse Transit TimeU01EB018818 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI MUKKAMALA, RAMAKRISHNA · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1U01EB018818-01NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB018818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goalWe tested the hypothesis that the ballistocardiogram (BCG) waveform could yield a viable proximal timing reference for measuring pulse transit time (PTT).

methodsFrom 15 healthy volunteers, we measured PTT as the time interval between BCG and a noninvasively measured finger blood pressure (BP) waveform. To evaluate the efficacy of the BCG-based PTT in estimating BP, we likewise measured pulse arrival time (PAT) using the electrocardiogram (ECG) as proximal timing reference and compared their correlations to BP.

resultsBCG-based PTT was correlated with BP reasonably well: the mean correlation coefficient (r ) was 0.62 for diastolic (DP), 0.65 for mean (MP), and 0.66 for systolic (SP) pressures when the intersecting tangent method was used as distal timing reference. Comparing four distal timing references (intersecting tangent, maximum second derivative, diastolic minimum, and systolic maximum), PTT exhibited the best correlation with BP when the systolic maximum method was used (mean r value was 0.66 for DP, 0.67 for MP, and 0.70 for SP). PTT was more strongly correlated with DP than PAT regardless of the distal timing reference: mean r value was 0.62 versus 0.51 (p = 0.07) for intersecting tangent, 0.54 versus 0.49 (p = 0.17) for maximum second derivative, 0.58 versus 0.52 (p = 0.37) for diastolic minimum, and 0.66 versus 0.60 (p = 0.10) for systolic maximum methods. The difference between PTT and PAT in estimating DP was significant (p = 0.01) when the r values associated with all the distal timing references were compared altogether. However, PAT appeared to outperform PTT in estimating SP ( p = 0.31 when the r values associated with all the distal timing references were compared altogether).

conclusionWe conclude that BCG is an adequate proximal timing reference in deriving PTT, and that BCG-based PTT may be superior to ECG-based PAT in estimating DP. SIGNIFICANCE: PTT with BCG as proximal timing reference has potential to enable convenient and ubiquitous cuffless BP monitoring.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAdultBallistocardiographyBlood Pressure DeterminationElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMalePulse Wave AnalysisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26054058
PMCPMC4626385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.