ArticleJAMA internal medicine2015
Use of Preoperative Testing and Physicians' Response to Professional Society Guidance.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Patient, provider, and system-level factors associated with preoperative cardiac testing: A systematic review.Journal of hospital medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Pre-anesthetic evaluation for gastrointestinal endoscopy in China: a national web-based questionnaire survey.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Cost of Care Cascades Following Low-Value Preoperative Electrocardiogram and Chest Radiograph Within the Veterans Health Administration.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Strategies for de-implementation of low-value care-a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- Is Low-value Testing Before Low-risk Hand Surgery Associated With Increased Downstream Healthcare Use and Reimbursements? A National Claims Database Analysis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2022Article
- Development of an Interventional Radiology Specific Algorithm for Pre-Procedural Laboratory Testing.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2021Article
- Variation in preoperative stress testing by patient, physician and surgical type: a cohort study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Exploration of a quality improvement process to standardised preoperative tests for a surgical procedure to reduce waste.BMJ open quality · 2021Article
- Does more testing in routine preoperative evaluation benefit the orthopedic patient? Case control study from a resource-constrained setting.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Feasibility evaluation of non-invasive cardiac function technology during echocardiography-based cardiac stress testing.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2020Article
- Increased Healthcare Utilization for Medical Comorbidities Prior to Surgery Improves Postoperative Outcomes.Annals of surgery · 2020Article
- Evaluation of an Intervention to Reduce Low-Value Preoperative Care for Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery at a Safety-Net Health System.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Article
- Can a smartphone app improve medical trainees' knowledge of antibiotics?International journal of medical education · 2017Article
- Disparities in the Quality of Cardiovascular Care Between HIV-Infected Versus HIV-Uninfected Adults in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2017Article
- Underuse of Prevention and Lifestyle Counseling in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2017Article
- Choosing Wisely: A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Unnecessary Preoperative Testing.BMJ quality improvement reports · 2017Article
- Pre-operative echocardiography among patients with coronary artery disease in the United States Veterans Affairs healthcare system: A retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2016Article
- Same day admission for elective cardiac surgery: how to improve outcome with satisfaction and decrease expenses.Journal of anesthesia · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
importanceThe value of routine preoperative testing before most surgical procedures is widely considered to be low. To improve the quality of preoperative care and reduce waste, 2 professional societies released guidance on use of routine preoperative testing in 2002, but researchers and policymakers remain concerned about the health and cost burden of low-value care in the preoperative setting.
objectiveTo examine the long-term national effect of the 2002 professional guidance from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association and the American Society of Anesthesiologists on physicians' use of routine preoperative testing. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsRetrospective analysis of nationally representative data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey to examine adults in the United States who were evaluated during preoperative visits from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2010. A quasiexperimental, difference-in-difference (DID) approach evaluated whether the publication of professional guidance in 2002 was associated with changes in preoperative testing patterns, adjusting for temporal trends in routine testing, as captured by testing patterns in general medical examinations. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Physician orders for outpatient plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, electrocardiogram, and cardiac stress testing.
resultsDuring the 14-year period, the average annual number of preoperative visits in the United States increased from 6.8 million in 1997-1999 to 9.8 million in 2002-2004 and 14.3 million in 2008-2010. After accounting for temporal trends in routine testing, we found no statistically significant overall changes in the use of plain radiography (11.3% in 1997-2002 to 9.9% in 2003-2010; DID, -1.0 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -4.1 to 2.2), hematocrit (9.4% in 1997-2002 to 4.1% in 2003-2010; DID, 1.2 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -2.2 to 4.7), urinalysis (12.2% in 1997-2002 to 8.9% in 2003-2010; DID, 2.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -1.7 to 7.1), or cardiac stress testing (1.0% in 1997-2002 to 2.0% in 2003-2010; DID, 0.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -0.1 to 1.5) after the publication of professional guidance. However, the rate of electrocardiogram testing fell (19.4% in 1997-2002 to 14.3% in 2003-2010; DID, -6.7 per 100 visits; 95% CI, -10.6 to -2.7) in the period after the publication of guidance. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The release of the 2002 guidance on routine preoperative testing was associated with a reduced incidence of routine electrocardiogram testing but not of plain radiography, hematocrit, urinalysis, or cardiac stress testing. Because routine preoperative testing is generally considered to provide low incremental value, more concerted efforts to understand physician behavior and remove barriers to guideline adherence may improve health care quality and reduce costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.