Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26053481›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Adherence with Dosing Guideline in Patients with Impaired Renal Function at Hospital Discharge.

A Clara Drenth-van Maanen, Rob J van Marum, Paul A F Jansen, Jeannette E F Zwart, Wouter W van Solinge, Toine C G Egberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A Clara Drenth-van MaanenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Geriatrics, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy for Old persons (Ephor), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rob J van MarumExpertise Centre Pharmacotherapy for Old persons (Ephor), Utrecht, The Netherlands; Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Geriatrics, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands; VUmc, Department of General Practice & Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul A F JansenUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Geriatrics, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Expertise Centre Pharmacotherapy for Old persons (Ephor), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jeannette E F ZwartUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wouter W van SolingeUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Toine C G EgbertsExpertise Centre Pharmacotherapy for Old persons (Ephor), Utrecht, The Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences (UIPS), Department of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the prevalence, determinants, and potential clinical relevance of adherence with the Dutch dosing guideline in patients with impaired renal function at hospital discharge.

designRetrospective cohort study between January 2007 and July 2011.

settingAcademic teaching hospital in the Netherlands. SUBJECTS: Patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between 10-50 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at discharge and prescribed one or more medicines of which the dose is renal function dependent.

main outcome measuresThe prevalence of adherence with the Dutch renal dosing guideline was investigated, and the influence of possible determinants, such as reporting the eGFR and severity of renal impairment (severe: eGFR<30 and moderate: eGFR 30-50 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Furthermore, the potential clinical relevance of non-adherence was assessed.

results1327 patients were included, mean age 67 years, mean eGFR 38 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Adherence with the guideline was present in 53.9% (n=715) of patients. Reporting the eGFR, which was incorporated since April 2009, resulted in more adherence with the guideline: 50.7% vs. 57.0%, RR 1.12 (95% CI 1.02-1.25). Adherence was less in patients with severe renal impairment (46.0%), compared to patients with moderate renal impairment (58.1%, RR 0.79; 95% CI 0.70-0.89). 71.4% of the cases of non-adherence had the potential to cause moderate to severe harm.

conclusionRequired dosage adjustments in case of impaired renal function are often not performed at hospital discharge, which may cause harm to the majority of patients. Reporting the eGFR can be a small and simple first step to improve adherence with dosing guidelines.

Indexed as

HospitalsKidney Function TestsPatient CompliancePatient DischargePractice Guidelines as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID26053481
PMCPMC4459981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.