Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26053385›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2015

Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of Procalcitonin Test for Prodromal Meningococcal Disease-A Meta-Analysis.

Jennifer M Bell, Michael D Shields, Ashley Agus, Kathryn Dunlop, Thomas Bourke, Frank Kee, Fiona Lynn

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jennifer M BellCentre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Michael D ShieldsCentre for Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Ashley AgusNorthern Ireland Clinical Trial Unit, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Kathryn DunlopUlster Hospital Dundonald, South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Thomas BourkeRoyal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Frank KeeUKCRC Centre of Excellence for Public Health (NI), School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.
Fiona LynnSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite vaccines and improved medical intensive care, clinicians must continue to be vigilant of possible Meningococcal Disease in children. The objective was to establish if the procalcitonin test was a cost-effective adjunct for prodromal Meningococcal Disease in children presenting at emergency department with fever without source. METHODS AND

findingsData to evaluate procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests as indicators of Meningococcal Disease were collected from six independent studies identified through a systematic literature search, applying PRISMA guidelines. The data included 881 children with fever without source in developed countries.The optimal cut-off value for the procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and white cell count tests, each as an indicator of Meningococcal Disease, was determined. Summary Receiver Operator Curve analysis determined the overall diagnostic performance of each test with 95% confidence intervals. A decision analytic model was designed to reflect realistic clinical pathways for a child presenting with fever without source by comparing two diagnostic strategies: standard testing using combined C-reactive protein and white cell count tests compared to standard testing plus procalcitonin test. The costs of each of the four diagnosis groups (true positive, false negative, true negative and false positive) were assessed from a National Health Service payer perspective. The procalcitonin test was more accurate (sensitivity=0.89, 95%CI=0.76-0.96; specificity=0.74, 95%CI=0.4-0.92) for early Meningococcal Disease compared to standard testing alone (sensitivity=0.47, 95%CI=0.32-0.62; specificity=0.8, 95% CI=0.64-0.9). Decision analytic model outcomes indicated that the incremental cost effectiveness ratio for the base case was £-8,137.25 (US $ -13,371.94) per correctly treated patient.

conclusionsProcalcitonin plus standard recommended tests, improved the discriminatory ability for fatal Meningococcal Disease and was more cost-effective; it was also a superior biomarker in infants. Further research is recommended for point-of-care procalcitonin testing and Markov modelling to incorporate cost per QALY with a life-time model.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinCritical PathwaysDecision TreesHumansLeukocyte CountMeningococcal InfectionsProtein PrecursorsROC CurveCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideC-Reactive ProteinProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID26053385
PMCPMC4459795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.