Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26053323›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2015

Brief and extended alcohol-cue-exposure effects on craving and attentional bias.

Jason J Ramirez, Peter M Monti, Ruth M Colwill

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Vicarious racial discrimination, racial identity, and alcohol-related outcomes among Black young adults: An experimental approach.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cognitive Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets of Addiction.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason J RamirezDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Peter M MontiDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Ruth M ColwillDepartment of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Brown University · US

Funding

Psychology Training in Alcohol Research (PTAR)T32AA007455 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MARY E. LARIMER · 1985 to 2026
$11.4M
Advancing a Bio-Psycho-Social Alcohol Treatment Research and Mentoring ProgramK05AA019681 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MONTI, PETER M. · 2010 to 2014
$1.2M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS K05AA019681NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007455NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA007455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past research has shown that underage college-student drinkers (UCSDs) report increased subjective craving and exhibit stronger attentional biases to alcohol following alcohol-cue exposure. To date, less research has examined whether momentary decreases in alcohol craving are associated with reductions in attentional bias. One experimental manipulation that has been used to produce within-session decreases in alcohol craving is to extend the duration of laboratory-based alcohol-cue exposure protocols. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of both brief and extended alcohol-cue exposure on subjective craving and attentional bias among UCSDs. Eighty participants were randomized either to a group that received a short, in vivo, alcohol-cue-exposure period (short-exposure group [SE], 2 3-min blocks) or to a group that received a long-exposure period (long-exposure group [LE], 6 3-min blocks). Both groups completed a visual probe task before and after cue exposure to assess changes in attentional bias. Analyses revealed no group differences in mean craving or mean attentional bias before or after cue exposure. Further, exploratory analyses revealed no sex differences in our measures of craving or attentional bias. For Group LE, but not Group SE, within-session changes in craving positively predicted within-session changes in attentional bias. However, further analyses revealed that this relationship was significant only for women in the LE group. Implications for treatments that aim to reduce craving and/or attentional bias are discussed.

Indexed as

BiasCuesAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingAnalysis of VarianceAttentionCravingEthanolFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleSex CharacteristicsYoung AdultEthanol

Identifiers

PMID26053323
PMCPMC4460597
OpenAlexW2443521822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.