Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26053296›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2015

Clear Skies and Grey Areas: Flight Attendants' Secondhand Smoke Exposure and Attitudes toward Smoke-Free Policy 25 Years since Smoking was Banned on Airplanes.

Frances A Stillman, Andrea Soong, Laura Y Zheng, Ana Navas-Acien

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05016505 (A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05016505 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Support Smoke-Free Policy Compliance in Public Housing

TypeinterventionalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled405ConditionsSmoking, Smoking Cessation, Smoking Reduction, Smoking BehaviorsArmsReduction (relocation and reduction of personal smoking) and cessation, Resident Endorsement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Frances A StillmanDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. fstillm1@jhu.edu.
Andrea SoongDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. asoong@jhu.edu.
Laura Y ZhengDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD 21205, USA. lzheng15@jhu.edu.
Ana Navas-AcienDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, MD 21205, USA. anavasa1@jhu.edu.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Targeted Research Training CoreT42OH008428 · OH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, GURUMURTHY · 2005 to 2025
$31.1M
NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428NIOSH CDC HHS T42OH008428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our objective was to provide descriptive data on flight attendant secondhand smoke (SHS) exposure in the work environment, and to examine attitudes toward SHS exposure, personal health, and smoke-free policy in the workplace and public places. Flight attendants completed a web-based survey of self-reported SHS exposure and air quality in the work environment. We assessed the frequency and duration of SHS exposure in distinct areas of the workplace, attitudes toward SHS exposure and its health effects, and attitudes toward smoke-free policy in the workplace as well as general public places. A total of 723 flight attendants participated in the survey, and 591 responded to all survey questions. The mean level of exposure per flight attendant over the past month was 249 min. The majority of participants reported being exposed to SHS always/often in outdoor areas of an airport (57.7%). Participants who worked before the in-flight smoking ban (n=240) were more likely to support further smoking policies in airports compared to participants who were employed after the ban (n=346) (76.7% versus 60.4%, p-value<0.01). Flight attendants are still being exposed to SHS in the workplace, sometimes at concerning levels during the non-flight portions of their travel. Flight attendants favor smoke-free policies and want to see further restrictions in airports and public places.

Indexed as

Air TravelAttitude to HealthEnvironmental ExposureSmoke-Free PolicyAdultAircraftAirportsFemaleHealth PolicyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRestaurantsTobacco Smoke PollutionUnited StatesYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollutionenvironmental healthflight attendantsoccupational healthpublic health policysecondhand smoketravel

Identifiers

PMID26053296
PMCPMC4483707
OpenAlexW2145543218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.