Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26053220›Full record

ArticleNature cell biology2015

The kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch to disrupt spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.

Pavithra Aravamudhan, Alan A Goldfarb, Ajit P Joglekar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature cell biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Structure and function of the outer kinetochore.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Principles and dynamics of spindle assembly checkpoint signalling.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Chemical tools for dissecting cell division.Nature chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pavithra AravamudhanBiophysics, University of Michigan, 930 N. University Avenue Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Alan A GoldfarbCell and developmental biology, University of Michigan, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, 3067 BSRB Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Ajit P Joglekar1] Biophysics, University of Michigan, 930 N. University Avenue Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA [2] Cell and developmental biology, University of Michigan, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, 3067 BSRB Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Architecture-function analysis of the kinetochore motorR01GM105948 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOGLEKAR, AJIT · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105948NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM-105948Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a unique signalling mechanism that responds to the state of attachment of the kinetochore to spindle microtubules. SAC signalling is activated by unattached kinetochores, and it is silenced after these kinetochores form end-on microtubule attachments. Although the biochemical cascade of SAC signalling is well understood, how kinetochore-microtubule attachment disrupts it remained unknown. Here we show that, in budding yeast, end-on microtubule attachment to the kinetochore physically separates the Mps1 kinase, which probably binds to the calponin homology domain of Ndc80, from the kinetochore substrate of Mps1, Spc105 (KNL1 orthologue). This attachment-mediated separation disrupts the phosphorylation of Spc105, and enables SAC silencing. Additionally, the Dam1 complex may act as a barrier that shields Spc105 from Mps1. Together these data suggest that the protein architecture of the kinetochore encodes a mechanical switch. End-on microtubule attachment to the kinetochore turns this switch off to silence the SAC.

Indexed as

Aurora KinasesCell Cycle CheckpointsCell Cycle ProteinsKinetochoresLuminescent ProteinsMicroscopy, FluorescenceMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMicrotubulesNocodazoleNuclear ProteinsPhosphorylationProtein BindingProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSignal TransductionAurora KinasesCell Cycle ProteinsDAM1 protein, S cerevisiaeIPL1 protein, S cerevisiaeLuminescent ProteinsMAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsMPS1 protein, S cerevisiaeNDC80 protein, S cerevisiaeNocodazoleNuclear ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSirolimusSpc105 protein, S cerevisiaeTubulin Modulators

Identifiers

PMID26053220
PMCPMC4630029
OpenAlexW1527499364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.