ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2015
Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells.
Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application and prospect of organoid technology in breast cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Pooled it
- Advances in the Research and Development of Breast Cancer Organoids.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Recent advancements in tissue dissociation techniques for cell manufacturing single-cell analysis and downstream processing.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Review
- Ovarian tumor cells gain competitive advantage by actively reducing the cellular fitness of microenvironment cells.Nature biotechnology · 2025Article
- Establishment and characterization of primary epithelial cell cultures from healthy canine mammary gland tissue.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The SEMA3F-NRP1/NRP2 axis is a key factor in the acquisition of invasive traits in in situ breast ductal carcinoma.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2024Article
- Organoid Cultures for the Study of Mammary Biology and Breast Cancer: The Promise and Challenges.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2024Review
- Optimization of mouse kidney digestion protocols for single-cell applications.Physiological genomics · 2024Article
- Navigating challenges: optimising methods for primary cell culture isolation.Cancer cell international · 2024Article
- Culture Models to Investigate Mechanisms of Milk Production and Blood-Milk Barrier in Mammary Epithelial Cells: a Review and a Protocol.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2023Review
- Article
- From Donor to the Lab: A Fascinating Journey of Primary Cell Lines.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Article
- Review
- Expanding and characterizing esophageal epithelial cells obtained from children with eosinophilic esophagitis.Pediatric research · 2018Article
- Glucocorticoids promote transition of ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive ductal carcinoma by inducing myoepithelial cell apoptosis.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2018Article
- Conditional Reprogramming of Pediatric Human Esophageal Epithelial Cells for Use in Tissue Engineering and Disease Investigation.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2017Article
- Molecular Portrait of the Normal Human Breast Tissue and Its Influence on Breast Carcinogenesis.Journal of breast cancer · 2016Review
- Amplexicaule A exerts anti-tumor effects by inducing apoptosis in human breast cancer.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- Breast primary epithelial cells that escape p16-dependent stasis enter a telomere-driven crisis state.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two lineages, epithelial, and myoepithelial cells are the main cell populations in the normal mammary gland and in breast cancer. Traditionally, cancer research has been performed using commercial cell lines, but primary cell cultures obtained from fresh breast tissue are a powerful tool to study more reliably new aspects of mammary gland biology, including normal and pathological conditions. Nevertheless, the methods described to date have some technical problems in terms of cell viability and yield, which hamper work with primary mammary cells. Therefore, there is a need to optimize technology for the proper isolation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. For this reason, we compared four methods in an effort to improve the isolation and primary cell culture of different cell populations of human mammary epithelium. The samples were obtained from healthy tissue of patients who had undergone mammoplasty or mastectomy surgery. We based our approaches on previously described methods, and incorporated additional steps to ameliorate technical efficiency and increase cell survival. We determined cell growth and viability by phase-contrast images, growth curve analysis and cell yield, and identified cell-lineage specific markers by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence in 3D cell cultures. These techniques allowed us to better evaluate the functional capabilities of these two main mammary lineages, using CD227/K19 (epithelial cells) and CD10/K14 (myoepithelial cells) antigens. Our results show that slow digestion at low enzymatic concentration combined with the differential centrifugation technique is the method that best fits the main goal of the present study: protocol efficiency and cell survival yield. In summary, we propose some guidelines to establish primary mammary epithelial cell lines more efficiently and to provide us with a strong research instrument to better understand the role of different epithelial cell types in the origin of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.