Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052514›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2015

Comparison of methods for the isolation of human breast epithelial and myoepithelial cells.

Arantzazu Zubeldia-Plazaola, Elisabet Ametller, Mario Mancino, Miquel Prats de Puig, Anna López-Plana, Flavia Guzman, Laia Vinyals, Eva M Pastor-Arroyo, Vanessa Almendro, Gemma Fuster and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. From Donor to the Lab: A Fascinating Journey of Primary Cell Lines.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Arantzazu Zubeldia-PlazaolaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet AmetllerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Mario MancinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Miquel Prats de PuigDepartment of Senology, Clínica Planas Barcelona, Spain.
Anna López-PlanaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Flavia GuzmanHistopathology-Citology, Anatomical Pathology Service, Centro Medico Teknon Barcelona, Spain.
Laia VinyalsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Eva M Pastor-ArroyoKidney and Acid-base Physiology Research Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland.
Vanessa AlmendroDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain ; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital Boston, MA, USA.
Gemma FusterDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro GascónDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Spain ; Department of Medicine, University of Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer Barcelona, Spain.
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESBrigham and Women's Hospital · USHospital Quirón Teknon · ESUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two lineages, epithelial, and myoepithelial cells are the main cell populations in the normal mammary gland and in breast cancer. Traditionally, cancer research has been performed using commercial cell lines, but primary cell cultures obtained from fresh breast tissue are a powerful tool to study more reliably new aspects of mammary gland biology, including normal and pathological conditions. Nevertheless, the methods described to date have some technical problems in terms of cell viability and yield, which hamper work with primary mammary cells. Therefore, there is a need to optimize technology for the proper isolation of epithelial and myoepithelial cells. For this reason, we compared four methods in an effort to improve the isolation and primary cell culture of different cell populations of human mammary epithelium. The samples were obtained from healthy tissue of patients who had undergone mammoplasty or mastectomy surgery. We based our approaches on previously described methods, and incorporated additional steps to ameliorate technical efficiency and increase cell survival. We determined cell growth and viability by phase-contrast images, growth curve analysis and cell yield, and identified cell-lineage specific markers by flow cytometry and immunofluorescence in 3D cell cultures. These techniques allowed us to better evaluate the functional capabilities of these two main mammary lineages, using CD227/K19 (epithelial cells) and CD10/K14 (myoepithelial cells) antigens. Our results show that slow digestion at low enzymatic concentration combined with the differential centrifugation technique is the method that best fits the main goal of the present study: protocol efficiency and cell survival yield. In summary, we propose some guidelines to establish primary mammary epithelial cell lines more efficiently and to provide us with a strong research instrument to better understand the role of different epithelial cell types in the origin of breast cancer.

Indexed as

epithelial cellsisolationmyoepithelial cellsprimary cell culture

Identifiers

PMID26052514
PMCPMC4440402
OpenAlexW1893602976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.