Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052439›Full record

ArticleMultidisciplinary respiratory medicine2015

Medical malpractice, defensive medicine and role of the "media" in Italy.

Domenico M Toraldo, Ughetta Vergari, Marta Toraldo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Collateral Victims of Defensive Medical Practice.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians' Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The Personal and Professional Impact of Patients' Complaints on Doctors-A Qualitative Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. The Law and Ethics of Switching from Biologic to Biosimilar in Canada.Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
    Article
  17. Defensive medicine in Europe: a 'full circle'?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  18. Defensive medicine in Europe: a 'full circle'?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Policy Challenges for Organ Allocation in an Era of "Precision Medicine".Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Domenico M ToraldoDepartment of Rehabilitation, Respiratory Care Unit, San Cesario di Lecce, Local Health Unit, via Croce di Lecce, Lecce, Italy ; Center for Bioethics and Human Rights, University of the Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Ughetta VergariDepartment of Humanities, Political Philosophy, Degree course in Political Science and International Relations, University of the Salento, Palazzo Parlangeli - Via Stampacchia, Lecce, 73100 Italy.
Marta ToraldoDepartment of Philophy, University of the Salento, Via A.C. Casetti n. 2, Lecce, 73100 Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many years until now, Italy has been subjected to an inconsistent and contradictory media campaign. On one hand the "media" present us with bold and reassuring messages about the progress of medical science; on the other hand they are prone to kneejerk criticism every time medical treatment does not have the desired effect, routinely describing such cases as glaring examples of "malasanità", an Italian word of recent coinage used to denote medical malpractice. Newspaper reports of legal proceedings involving health treatment are frequently full of errors and lack any scientific basis. DATA SOURCES: The published data confirm the unsustainably high number of lawsuits against doctors and medical structures, accompanied by demands for compensation arising from true or alleged medical errors or mistakes blamed on the work of health structures. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Currently Italian citizens have a greater awareness of their right to health than in the past, and patients' expectations have risen. A discrepancy is emerging between the current state of medical science and the capacities of individual doctors and health structures. Lastly, there is a need for greater monitoring of the quality of health care services and a greater emphasis on health risk prevention.

Indexed as

Clinical ethicsDefensive medicineMalpracticeMedical error

Identifiers

PMID26052439
PMCPMC4457994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.