Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052385›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of hepatology2015

Current concepts in the immunohistochemical evaluation of liver tumors.

Anne K Koehne de Gonzalez, Marcela A Salomao, Stephen M Lagana

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of hepatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Nonoperative Management of Hepatic Adenomas: A Review.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Wanted: Dead or Alive Cells with Propidium Iodide Staining in Liver Tissue.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Update on hepatocellular carcinoma: Pathologists' review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne K Koehne de GonzalezAnne K Koehne de Gonzalez, Marcela A Salomao, Stephen M Lagana, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Marcela A SalomaoAnne K Koehne de Gonzalez, Marcela A Salomao, Stephen M Lagana, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Stephen M LaganaAnne K Koehne de Gonzalez, Marcela A Salomao, Stephen M Lagana, Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Columbia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunohistochemistry often plays an important role in the evaluation of liver tumors. Recent advances have established a classification system for hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) based on morphology, molecular alterations, and immunohistochemistry. Specifically, loss of liver fatty acid binding protein is seen in HNF1α-inactivated HCA, staining with serum amyloid A is seen in inflammatory HCA, and diffuse staining with glutamine synthetase (GS) is seen in β-catenin activated HCA. A panel of immunohistochemical stains including glypican-3 (GPC-3), heat shock protein 70, and GS are useful in distinguishing HCC from non-malignant dysplastic nodules. Immunohistochemistry is also useful to determine whether a liver tumor is of primary hepatocellular or metastatic origin. Recently described markers useful for this purpose include arginase-1, GPC-3, and bile salt export pump. These newer markers may offer superior utility when compared to traditional markers of hepatocellular differentiation such as alpha-fetoprotein, hepatocyte paraffin-1, polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen, and CD10. This paper will review recent advances in the immunohistochemical evaluation of liver tumors.

Indexed as

Focal nodular hyperplasiaHepatocellular adenomaHepatocellular carcinomaImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID26052385
PMCPMC4450203
OpenAlexW2408723341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.