Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052350›Full record

ArticleJournal on data semantics2015

Analysis and Prediction of User Editing Patterns in Ontology Development Projects.

Hao Wang, Tania Tudorache, Dejing Dou, Natalya F Noy, Mark A Musen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal on data semantics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of biomedical ontologies and mappings: Overview of recent approaches.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hao WangDepartment of Computer and Information Science, 1202 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Tania TudoracheStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Dejing DouDepartment of Computer and Information Science, 1202 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA.
Natalya F NoyStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Mark A MusenStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Collaborative Development of Biomedical Ontologies and TerminologiesR01GM086587 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2009 to 2016
$4.1M
Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontologies: ERP Knowledge Representation & IntegrationR01EB007684 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI DOU, DEJING · 2009 to 2012
$2.2M
Protege: An Ontology-Development Platform for Biomedical ScientistsR01GM103316 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2013 to 2016
$2.1M
Understanding the Mechanism of Social Network Influence in Health Outcomes througR01GM103309 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI DOU, DEJING · 2013 to 2015
$1.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007684NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM086587NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103309NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of real-world ontologies is a complex undertaking, commonly involving a group of domain experts with different expertise that work together in a collaborative setting. These ontologies are usually large scale and have complex structures. To assist in the authoring process, ontology tools are key at making the editing process as streamlined as possible. Being able to predict confidently what the users are likely to do next as they edit an ontology will enable us to focus and structure the user interface accordingly and to facilitate more efficient interaction and information discovery. In this paper, we use data mining, specifically the association rule mining, to investigate whether we are able to predict the next editing operation that a user will make based on the change history. We simulated and evaluated continuous prediction across time using sliding window model. We used the association rule mining to generate patterns from the ontology change logs in the training window and tested these patterns on logs in the adjacent testing window. We also evaluated the impact of different training and testing window sizes on the prediction accuracies. At last, we evaluated our prediction accuracies across different user groups and different ontologies. Our results indicate that we can indeed predict the next editing operation a user is likely to make. We will use the discovered editing patterns to develop a recommendation module for our editing tools, and to design user interface components that better fit with the user editing behaviors.

Indexed as

Collaborative Ontology DevelopmentData Mining Association Rule MiningOntologyUser Editing Pattern

Identifiers

PMID26052350
PMCPMC4454427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.