Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052222›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2015

Inferring Stable Acquisition Durations for Applications of Perfusion Imaging in Oncology.

Brian P Hobbs, Chaan S Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian P HobbsDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Chaan S NgDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue perfusion plays a critical role in oncology. Growth and migration of cancerous cells requires proliferation of networks of new blood vessels through the process of tumor angiogenesis. Many imaging technologies developed recently attempt to measure characteristics pertaining to the passage of fluid through blood vessels, thereby providing a noninvasive means for cancer detection, as well as treatment prognostication, prediction, and monitoring. However, because these techniques require a sequence of successive imaging scans under administration of intravenous imaging tracers, the quality of the resulting perfusion data depends on the acquisition protocol. In this paper, we explain how to infer stability for stochastic curve estimation. The topic is motivated by two recent attempts to determine stable acquisition durations for acquiring perfusion characteristics using dynamic computed tomography, wherein inference used inappropriate statistical methods. Notably, when appropriate statistical techniques are used, the resulting conclusions deviate substantially from those previously reported in the literature.

Indexed as

dynamic computed tomographyequivalence testingpenalized splinesperfusion imagingsemiparametric regression

Identifiers

PMID26052222
PMCPMC4444141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.