Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26052111›Full record

ArticleMedical humanities2015

Critical medical humanities: embracing entanglement, taking risks.

William Viney, Felicity Callard, Angela Woods

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical humanities, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bridging the Gap in Humanizing Oncology: A Pilot Study on the Feasibility and Acceptability of the CIPOMO School of Medical Humanities Training Protocol.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Potential of Poetry in Mental Health Nurse Pre-registration Education.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. History at the heart of medicine.Wellcome open research · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The art of equity: critical health humanities in practice.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Advancing Psychiatric Curricula Through a Diverse Lens.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  20. Embracing complexity in primary care.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William VineyDepartment of English Studies and Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Felicity CallardDepartment of Geography and Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Angela WoodsSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, and Centre for Medical Humanities, Durham University, Durham, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 103817Wellcome Trust WT086049Wellcome Trust WT098455MAWellcome Trust WT103817MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What can the medical humanities achieve? This paper does not seek to define what is meant by the medical humanities, nor to adjudicate the exact disciplinary or interdisciplinary knowledges it should offer, but rather to consider what it might be capable of doing. Exploring the many valences of the word 'critical', we argue here for a critical medical humanities characterised by: (i) a widening of the sites and scales of 'the medical' beyond the primal scene of the clinical encounter; (ii) greater attention not simply to the context and experience of health and illness, but to their constitution at multiple levels; (iii) closer engagement with critical theory, queer and disability studies, activist politics and other allied fields; (iv) recognition that the arts, humanities and social sciences are best viewed not as in service or in opposition to the clinical and life sciences, but as productively entangled with a 'biomedical culture'; and, following on from this, (v) robust commitment to new forms of interdisciplinary and cross-sector collaboration. We go on to introduce the five other articles published in this special issue of the journal, reflecting on the ways in which collaboration and critique are articulated in their analyses of immunology, critical neuroscience, toxicity, global clinical labour, and psychological coercion and workfare. As these articles demonstrate, embracing the complex role of critical collaborator--one based on notions of entanglement, rather than servility or antagonism--will, we suggest, develop the imaginative and creative heterodox qualities and practices which have long been recognised as core strengths of the medical humanities.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorDelivery of Health CareHumanitiesSocial SciencesHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationSocial science

Identifiers

PMID26052111
PMCPMC4484495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.