Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26051941›Full record

ArticleCell reports2015

Single-Cell Network Analysis Identifies DDIT3 as a Nodal Lineage Regulator in Hematopoiesis.

Cristina Pina, José Teles, Cristina Fugazza, Gillian May, Dapeng Wang, Yanping Guo, Shamit Soneji, John Brown, Patrik Edén, Mattias Ohlsson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Differential Network Analysis Reveals Regulatory Patterns in Neural Stem Cell Fate Decision.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Network Modeling in Biology: Statistical Methods for Gene and Brain Networks.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2021
    Article
  10. The Identified Hub Gene GlcN in Osteoarthritis Progression and Treatment.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Cristina PinaStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
José TelesStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK; Computational Biology and Biological Physics, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Cristina FugazzaStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
Gillian MayStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
Dapeng WangStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
Yanping GuoStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
Shamit SonejiStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
John BrownStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK.
Patrik EdénComputational Biology and Biological Physics, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Mattias OhlssonComputational Biology and Biological Physics, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Carsten PetersonComputational Biology and Biological Physics, Department of Astronomy and Theoretical Physics, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Tariq EnverStem Cell Laboratory, UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London W1CE 6BT, UK. Electronic address: t.enver@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBLund University · SE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12796Medical Research Council MC_U137973817Medical Research Council MR/M009033/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore cell heterogeneity during spontaneous and transcription-factor-driven commitment for network inference in hematopoiesis. Since individual genes display discrete OFF states or a distribution of ON levels, we compute and combine pairwise gene associations from binary and continuous components of gene expression in single cells. Ddit3 emerges as a regulatory node with positive linkage to erythroid regulators and negative association with myeloid determinants. Ddit3 loss impairs erythroid colony output from multipotent cells, while forcing Ddit3 in granulo-monocytic progenitors (GMPs) enhances self-renewal and impedes differentiation. Network analysis of Ddit3-transduced GMPs reveals uncoupling of myeloid networks and strengthening of erythroid linkages. RNA sequencing suggests that Ddit3 acts through development or stabilization of a precursor upstream of GMPs with inherent Meg-E potential. The enrichment of Gata2 target genes in Ddit3-dependent transcriptional responses suggests that Ddit3 functions in an erythroid transcriptional network nucleated by Gata2.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsCell DifferentiationGATA2 Transcription FactorHematopoiesisHumansMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutSingle-Cell AnalysisTranscription Factor CHOPDDIT3 protein, humanDdit3 protein, mouseGata2 protein, mouseGATA2 Transcription FactorTranscription Factor CHOP

Identifiers

PMID26051941
PMCPMC4528262
OpenAlexW1697828529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.