Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26051927›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of hospital infection2015

Effectiveness of contact precautions against multidrug-resistant organism transmission in acute care: a systematic review of the literature.

C C Cohen, B Cohen, J Shang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of hospital infection, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patient care experience with utilization of isolation precautions: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Re-visiting contact precautions - 25 years on.Journal of infection prevention · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Barrier Precautions in the Era of Multidrug Pathogens.Current treatment options in infectious diseases · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Checking rounds for isolation precautions in the control of multidrug-resistant organisms: reduction achieved.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Article
  20. Colonization pressure as a risk factor of ICU-acquired multidrug resistant bacteria: a prospective observational study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C C CohenColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: chc2144@columbia.edu.
B CohenColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
J ShangColumbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · US

Funding

Training in Interdisciplinary Research to Prevent Infections (TIRI)T32NR013454 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LARSON, ELAINE LUCILLE, SAIMAN, LISA · 2012 to 2017
$1.4M
'Multi-Drug Resistant Infections and Isolation Precautions in Nursing Homes'F31NR015176 · NINR · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI COHEN, CATHERINE CRAWFORD · 2014 to 2015
$55k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR015176NINR NIH HHS F31NR015176-01NINR NIH HHS T32 NR013454NINR NIH HHS T32NR013454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact precautions are widely recommended to prevent multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) transmission. However, conflicting data exist regarding their effectiveness. Prior systematic reviews examined contact precautions as part of a larger bundled approach, limiting ability to understand their effectiveness. The aim of this review was to characterize the effectiveness of contact precautions alone against transmission of any MDRO among adult acute care patients. Directed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement, comprehensive searches of four electronic scientific literature databases were conducted for studies published in English from January 2004 to June 2014. Studies were included if interventional, original research, evaluating contact isolation precautions against MDRO transmission among inpatients. Searches returned 284 studies, six of which were included in the review. These studies measured four different MDROs with one study showing a reduction in transmission. Whereas studies were of high quality regarding outcome operationalization and statistical analyses, overall quality was moderate to low due to poor intervention description, population characterization and potential biases. Where compliance was measured (N = 4), it presented a threat to validity because it included select parts of the intervention, ranged from 21% to 87%, and was significantly different across study phases (N = 2). The poor quality of evidence on this topic continues to limit interpretation of these data. Hence, this conflicting body of literature does not constitute evidence for or against contact precautions. We recommend that researchers consider power calculation, compliance monitoring, non-equivalent concurrent controls when designing future studies on this topic.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCommunicable DiseasesCross InfectionDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialGuideline AdherenceHospitalsHumansInfection ControlQuality of Health CareContact precautionsInfection controlInfection preventionMultidrug-resistant organismNosocomial

Identifiers

PMID26051927
PMCPMC4486607
OpenAlexW1601076908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.