Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26051431›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2015

Categorical versus continuous circulating tumor cell enumeration as early surrogate marker for therapy response and prognosis during docetaxel therapy in metastatic prostate cancer patients.

Mark Thalgott, Brigitte Rack, Matthias Eiber, Michael Souvatzoglou, Matthias M Heck, Caroline Kronester, Ulrich Andergassen, Victoria Kehl, Bernd J Krause, Jurgen E Gschwend and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospective evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2018
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mark ThalgottDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. mark.thalgott@lrz.tum.de.
Brigitte RackDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Innenstadt, Maistrasse 11, 80337, Munich, Germany. Brigitte.Rack@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Matthias EiberDepartment of Radiology, Munich, Germany. matthias.eiber@gmx.de.
Michael SouvatzoglouDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Munich, Germany. msouvatz@yahoo.de.
Matthias M HeckDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. m.heck@lrz.tu-muenchen.de.
Caroline KronesterDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. carokronester@gmx.de.
Ulrich AndergassenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Klinikum Innenstadt, Maistrasse 11, 80337, Munich, Germany. Ulrich.Andergassen@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Victoria KehlInstitute of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. victoria.kehl@tum.de.
Bernd J KrauseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Germany. bernd.krause@uni-rostock.de.
Jurgen E GschwendDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Juergen.Gschwend@lrz.tu-muenchen.de.
Margitta RetzDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Margitta.Retz@lrz.tu-muenchen.de.
Roman NawrothDepartment of Urology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. Roman.Nawroth@lrz.tu-muenchen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCirculating tumor cell (CTCs) counts might serve as early surrogate marker for treatment efficacy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. We prospectively assessed categorical and continuous CTC-counts for their utility in early prediction of radiographic response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in mCRPC patients treated with docetaxel.

methodsCTC-counts were assessed in 122 serial samples, as continuous or categorical (<5 vs. ≥5 CTCs) variables, at baseline (q0) and after 1 (q1), 4 (q4) and 10 (q10) cycles of docetaxel (3-weekly, 75 mg/m2) in 33 mCRPC patients. Treatment response (TR) was defined as non-progressive (non-PD) and progressive disease (PD), by morphologic RECIST or clinical criteria at q4 and q10. Binary logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used as statistical methods.

resultsCategorical CTC-count status predicted PD at q4 already after one cycle (q1) and after 4 cycles (q4) of chemotherapy with an odds ratio (OR) of 14.9 (p=0.02) and 18.0 (p=0.01). Continuous CTC-values predicted PD only at q4 (OR 1.04, p=0.048). Regarding PFS, categorical CTC-counts at q1 were independent prognostic markers with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.85 (95% CI 1.1-13.8, p=0.04) whereas early continuous CTC-values at q1 failed significance (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.99-1.05, p=0.14). For OS early categorical and continuous CTC-counts were independent prognostic markers at q1 with a HR of 3.0 (95% CI 1.6-15.7, p=0.007) and 1.02 (95% CI 1.0-1.040, p=0.04).

conclusionsCategorical CTC-count status is an early independent predictor for TR, PFS and OS only 3 weeks following treatment initiation with docetaxel whereas continuous CTC-counts were an inconsistent surrogate marker in mCRPC patients. For clinical practice, categorical CTC-counts may provide complementary information towards individualized treatment strategies with early prediction of treatment efficacy and optimized sequential treatment.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrecision MedicinePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantTaxoidsTreatment OutcomeBiomarkers, TumorDocetaxelTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID26051431
PMCPMC4459665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.