Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26051027›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2015

Latent Class Analysis of DSM-5 Alcohol Use Disorder Criteria Among Heavy-Drinking College Students.

Dipali Venkataraman Rinker, Clayton Neighbors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. I am what I am: A meta-analysis of the association between substance user identities and substance use-related outcomes.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Not all alcohol use disorder criteria are equally severe: Toward severity grading of individual criteria in college drinkers.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Alcohol consumption, drinker identity, and quality of life among students: why there cannot be one prevention strategy for all.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. An Empirical Assessment of the Sensitivity of Mixture Models to Changes in Measurement.Structural equation modeling : a multidisciplinary journal · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dipali Venkataraman RinkerUniversity of Houston, Department of Psychology, 126 Heyne Bldg Ste 220, Houston, Texas 77204. Electronic address: dvrinker@uh.edu.
Clayton NeighborsUniversity of Houston, Department of Psychology, 126 Heyne Bldg Ste 220, Houston, Texas 77204. Electronic address: cneighbors@uh.edu.

Funding

Social Norms and Alcohol Prevention (SNAP)R01AA014576 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI NEIGHBORS, CLAYTON · 2004 to 2015
$4.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA014576NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA014576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The DSM-5 has created significant changes in the definition of alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Limited work has considered the impact of these changes in specific populations, such as heavy-drinking college students. Latent class analysis (LCA) is a person-centered approach that divides a population into mutually exclusive and exhaustive latent classes, based on observable indicator variables. The present research was designed to examine whether there were distinct classes of heavy-drinking college students who met DSM-5 criteria for an AUD and whether gender, perceived social norms, use of protective behavioral strategies (PBS), drinking refusal self-efficacy (DRSE), self-perceptions of drinking identity, psychological distress, and membership in a fraternity/sorority would be associated with class membership. Three-hundred and ninety-four college students who met DSM-5 criteria for an AUD were recruited from three different universities. Two distinct classes emerged: Less Severe (86%), the majority of whom endorsed both drinking more than intended and tolerance, as well as met criteria for a mild AUD; and More Severe (14%), the majority of whom endorsed at least half of the DSM-5 AUD criteria and met criteria for a severe AUD. Relative to the Less Severe class, membership in the More Severe class was negatively associated with DRSE and positively associated with self-identification as a drinker. There is a distinct class of heavy-drinking college students with a more severe AUD and for whom intervention content needs to be more focused and tailored. Clinical implications are discussed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol Drinking in CollegeAlcohol-Related DisordersDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental DisordersFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacySeverity of Illness IndexUniversitiesYoung AdultAlcoholCollege studentsDSM-5Latent class analysis

Identifiers

PMID26051027
PMCPMC4561001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.