Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26050922›Full record

ArticleGynecologic oncology2015

In vivo tumor growth of high-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines.

Anirban K Mitra, David A Davis, Sunil Tomar, Lynn Roy, Hilal Gurler, Jia Xie, Daniel D Lantvit, Horacio Cardenas, Fang Fang, Yueying Liu and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gynecologic oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Loss ofOncotarget · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anirban K MitraMedical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
David A DavisDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sunil TomarMedical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Lynn RoyDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend; Harper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN.
Hilal GurlerDepartment of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Jia XieDepartment of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Daniel D LantvitDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Horacio CardenasDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Fang FangMedical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States.
Yueying LiuHarper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Elizabeth LoughranHarper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Jing YangHarper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
M Sharon StackHarper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Robert E EmersonDepartment of Pathology Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Karen D Cowden DahlDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine-South Bend; Harper Cancer Research Institute, Notre Dame, IN; Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, United States.
Maria V BarbolinaDepartment of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
Kenneth P NephewMedical Sciences Program, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, United States; Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Daniela MateiDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Joanna E BurdetteDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

Funding

Receptor Cross-Talk in Early Metastatic DisseminationR01CA109545 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI STACK, MARY SHARON · 2006 to 2022
$4.3M
REGULATION OF OVARIAN CARCINOMA PROTEINASESR01CA086984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME · PI STACK, MARY SHARON · 2000 to 2014
$3.8M
An Epigenetic Strategy for Restoring Carboplatin Sensitivity in Ovarian CancerR01CA182832 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI MATEI, DANIELA E, NEPHEW, KENNETH P · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
The Tissue Transglutaminase-Fibronectin Interaction in Ovarian Cancer MetastasisI01BX000792 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI MATEI, DANIELA E · 2011 to 2024
–
BLRD VA I01 BX000792NCI NIH HHS CA086984NCI NIH HHS CA109545NCI NIH HHS CA182832NCI NIH HHS R01 CA086984NCI NIH HHS R01 CA109545NCI NIH HHS R01 CA182832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGenomic studies of ovarian cancer (OC) cell lines frequently used in research revealed that these cells do not fully represent high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), the most common OC histologic type. However, OC lines that appear to genomically resemble HGSOC have not been extensively used and their growth characteristics in murine xenografts are essentially unknown.

methodsTo better understand growth patterns and characteristics of HGSOC cell lines in vivo, CAOV3, COV362, KURAMOCHI, NIH-OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, OVCAR8, OVSAHO, OVKATE, SNU119 and UWB1.289 cells were assessed for tumor formation in nude mice. Cells were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) or subcutaneously (s.c.) in female athymic nude mice and allowed to grow (maximum of 90 days) and tumor formation was analyzed. All tumors were sectioned and assessed using H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for p53, PAX8 and WT1 expression.

resultsSix lines (OVCAR3, OVCAR4, OVCAR5, OVCAR8, CAOV3, and OVSAHO) formed i.p xenografts with HGSOC histology. OVKATE and COV362 formed s.c. tumors only. Rapid tumor formation was observed for OVCAR3, OVCAR5 and OVCAR8, but only OVCAR8 reliably formed ascites. Tumors derived from OVCAR3, OVCAR4, and OVKATE displayed papillary features. Of the 11 lines examined, three (Kuramochi, SNU119 and UWB1.289) were non-tumorigenic.

conclusionsOur findings help further define which HGSOC cell models reliably generate tumors and/or ascites, critical information for preclinical drug development, validating in vitro findings, imaging and prevention studies by the OC research community.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCell Growth ProcessesCell Line, TumorCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHeterograftsHumansMiceMice, NudeNeoplasm GradingOvarian NeoplasmsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX8 Transcription FactorTumor Suppressor Protein p53WT1 ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX8 protein, humanPAX8 Transcription FactorTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53WT1 protein, humanWT1 ProteinsHigh grade serous ovarian cancerMouse modelPax8Xenograft

Identifiers

PMID26050922
PMCPMC4528621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.