Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26050590›Full record

ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2015

Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9802: Controversy or Consensus in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Low-Grade Glioma?

Nadia N Laack, Jann N Sarkaria, Jan C Buckner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multidisciplinary Management of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Mutated Gliomas in a Contemporary Molecularly Defined Era.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Current Management of Adult Diffuse Infiltrative Low Grade Gliomas.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Article
  17. Hemizygous deletion ofNeuro-oncology advances
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nadia N LaackDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: Laack.nadia@mayo.edu.
Jann N SarkariaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Jan C BucknerDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Targeted MV-CEA as a Potent Antitumor Agent against GBMP50CA108961 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI O'NEILL, BRIAN PATRICK · 2004 to 2015
$22.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA108961NCI NIH HHS P50CA108961-8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of newly diagnosed or suspected low-grade glioma (LGG) is one of the most controversial areas in neuro-oncology. The heterogeneity of these tumors, concern regarding morbidity of treatment, and absence of proven overall survival benefit from any known treatment have resulted in a lack of consensus regarding the timing and extent of surgery, timing of radiotherapy (RT), and role of chemotherapy. The long-term results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9802, a phase III randomized trial comparing RT alone with RT and 6 cycles of adjuvant procarbazine, CCNU, vincristine (PCV), demonstrated an unprecedented 5.5-year improvement in median overall survival with the addition of PCV chemotherapy in high-risk patients with LGG. These results are practice changing and define a new standard of care for these patients. However, in the intervening decade since the trial was completed, novel molecular markers as well as newer chemotherapy agents such as temozolomide have been developed, which make these results difficult to incorporate into clinical practice. This review summarizes the evidence for and against the role of upfront RT and PCV in newly diagnosed patients with LGG.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials, Phase III as TopicConsensusRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicBrain NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantGliomaHumans

Identifiers

PMID26050590
PMCPMC5434758
OpenAlexW2083295772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.