ReviewSeminars in radiation oncology2015
Advances in Magnetic Resonance and Positron Emission Tomography Imaging: Assessing Response in the Treatment of Low-Grade Glioma.
Review in Seminars in radiation oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resolving challenges in detection and quantification of D-2-hydroxyglutarate and L-2-hydroxyglutarate via LC/MS.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2026Article
- Role of CXCR4 PET Imaging for the Evaluation of Gliomas: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Cancers · 2026Review
- Nanoparticle Drug Delivery System for Glioma and Its Efficacy Improvement Strategies: A Comprehensive Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020Review
- Sequential Apparent Diffusion Coefficient for Assessment of Tumor Progression in Patients with Low-Grade Glioma.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Following combined-modality therapy for the treatment of low-grade gliomas, the assessment of treatment response and the evaluation of disease progression are uniformly challenging. In this article, we review existing response criteria, and discuss the limitations of conventional magnetic resonance imaging to distinguish between progression and treatment effect. We review the data on advanced imaging techniques including positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging, which may enhance the interpretation of posttreatment changes, and enable the earlier assessment of the efficacy and toxicity of therapy in these patients with prolonged survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.