Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26050254›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of epidemiology2015

Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).

Emily Herrett, Arlene M Gallagher, Krishnan Bhaskaran, Harriet Forbes, Rohini Mathur, Tjeerd van Staa, Liam Smeeth

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06444711 (A Randomised Clinical Trial for OPTIMISation of Cardio-renal-metabolic-pulmonary Disease Guideline Adherence in High Risk Community Dwelling Individuals and Evaluation of Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 1,522 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,522citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06444711 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Randomised Clinical Trial for OPTIMISation of Cardio-renal-metabolic-pulmonary Disease Guideline Adherence in High Risk Community Dwelling Individuals and Evaluation of Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of LeedsRan2025 to 2045Enrolled138ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Renal Disease, Metabolic Disease, Pulmonary DiseaseArmsNICE guidance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,522 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Big data and psychiatry: advances, constraints and future directions.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1,462 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emily HerrettLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, Emily.Herrett@lshtm.ac.uk.
Arlene M GallagherClinical Practice Research Datalink, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands and.
Krishnan BhaskaranLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Harriet ForbesLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rohini MathurLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Tjeerd van StaaLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands and Health eResearch Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Liam SmeethLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006584/1Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1Wellcome Trust 098504Wellcome Trust 098504/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an ongoing primary care database of anonymised medical records from general practitioners, with coverage of over 11.3 million patients from 674 practices in the UK. With 4.4 million active (alive, currently registered) patients meeting quality criteria, approximately 6.9% of the UK population are included and patients are broadly representative of the UK general population in terms of age, sex and ethnicity. General practitioners are the gatekeepers of primary care and specialist referrals in the UK. The CPRD primary care database is therefore a rich source of health data for research, including data on demographics, symptoms, tests, diagnoses, therapies, health-related behaviours and referrals to secondary care. For over half of patients, linkage with datasets from secondary care, disease-specific cohorts and mortality records enhance the range of data available for research. The CPRD is very widely used internationally for epidemiological research and has been used to produce over 1000 research studies, published in peer-reviewed journals across a broad range of health outcomes. However, researchers must be aware of the complexity of routinely collected electronic health records, including ways to manage variable completeness, misclassification and development of disease definitions for research.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicElectronic Health RecordsPrimary Health CareBiomedical ResearchData AccuracyGeneral PractitionersHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID26050254
PMCPMC4521131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.