Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26050104›Full record

Trial reportClinical rheumatology2016

Itolizumab in combination with methotrexate modulates active rheumatoid arthritis: safety and efficacy from a phase 2, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, dose-ranging study.

Arvind Chopra, S Chandrashekara, Rajgopalan Iyer, Liza Rajasekhar, Naresh Shetty, Sarathchandra Mouli Veeravalli, Alakendu Ghosh, Mrugank Merchant, Jyotsna Oak, Vikram Londhey and 3 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical rheumatology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Arvind ChopraDepartment of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatic Disease, Pune, India.
S ChandrashekaraChanRe Rheumatology and Immunology Centre and Research, Bangalore, India.
Rajgopalan IyerDepartment of Orthopedics, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Liza RajasekharDepartment of Rheumatology, Nizams institute of Medical sciences, Hyderabad, India.
Naresh ShettyDepartment of Orthopedics, M.S. Ramaiah Memorial Hospital, Bangalore, India.
Sarathchandra Mouli VeeravalliDepartment of Rheumatology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Secunderabad, India.
Alakendu GhoshDepartment of Rheumatology, Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research, Kolkata, India.
Mrugank MerchantDepartment of Orthopedics, Shubhechha Multispecialty Hospital, Vadodara, India.
Jyotsna OakDepartment of Rheumatology, LTM Medical College & LTMG Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Vikram LondheyMedicine Department and Rheumatology Clinic, TNMC & BYL Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
Abhijit BarveResearch & Development, Biocon Research Limited, Bommasandra Industrial Estate - phase IV, Bangalore, 560099, India. abhijit.barve@biocon.com.
M S RamakrishnanResearch & Development, Biocon Research Limited, Bommasandra Industrial Estate - phase IV, Bangalore, 560099, India.
Enrique MonteroResearch & Development, Biocon Research Limited, Bommasandra Industrial Estate - phase IV, Bangalore, 560099, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of itolizumab with methotrexate in active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who had inadequate response to methotrexate. In this open-label, phase 2 study, 70 patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and negative for latent tuberculosis were randomized to four arms: 0.2, 0.4, or 0.8 mg/kg itolizumab weekly combined with oral methotrexate, and methotrexate alone (2:2:2:1). Patients were treated for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks of methotrexate alone during follow-up. Twelve weeks of itolizumab therapy was well tolerated. Forty-four patients reported adverse events (AEs); except for six severe AEs, all others were mild or moderate. Infusion-related reactions mainly occurred after the first infusion, and none were reported after the 11th infusion. No serum anti-itolizumab antibodies were detected. In the full analysis set, all itolizumab doses showed evidence of efficacy. At 12 weeks, 50 % of the patients achieved ACR20, and 58.3 % moderate or good 28-joint count Disease Activity Score (DAS-28) response; at week 24, these responses were seen in 22 and 31 patients. Significant improvements were seen in Short Form-36 Health Survey and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index scores. Overall, itolizumab in combination with methotrexate was well tolerated and efficacious in RA for 12 weeks, with efficacy persisting for the entire 24-week evaluation period. (Clinical Trial Registry of India, http://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/login.php , CTRI/2008/091/000295).

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPatient SafetyReproducibility of ResultsRheumatologyAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntirheumatic AgentsitolizumabMethotrexateACRCD6DAS-28ItolizumabMethotrexateMonoclonal antibody

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.