Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26049775›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2015

Update on the Epidemiology of Concussion/Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Jameson D Voss, Joseph Connolly, Karen A Schwab, Ann I Scher

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Concussion Recovery: A Pilot Clinical Trial.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2021
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of question wording for self-reported traumatic brain injuries among adults: findings from the 2023 SummerStyles survey.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jameson D VossEpidemiology Consult Service, U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM), 2510 5th Street, Building 840, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), OH, 45433-7913, USA, jameson.voss@us.af.mil.
Joseph Connolly
Karen A Schwab
Ann I Scher

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mild traumatic injuries to the brain (e.g., concussion) are common and have been recognized since antiquity, although definitions have varied historically. Nonetheless, studying the epidemiology of concussion helps clarify the overall importance, risk factors, and at-risk populations for this injury. The present review will focus on recent findings related to the epidemiology of concussion including definition controversies, incidence, and patterns in the population overall and in the military and athlete populations specifically. Finally, as this is an area of active research, we will discuss how future epidemiologic observations hold promise for gaining greater clarity about concussion and mild traumatic brain injury.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelBrainBrain ConcussionBrain InjuriesHumansIncidence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.