ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015
Robust and automated three-dimensional segmentation of densely packed cell nuclei in different biological specimens with Lines-of-Sight decomposition.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review of computational and image analysis techniques for quantitative evaluation of striated muscle tissue architecture.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Marker-controlled watershed with deep edge emphasis and optimized H-minima transform for automatic segmentation of densely cultivated 3D cell nuclei.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Single cell organization and cell cycle characterization of DNA stained multicellular tumor spheroids.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Long-term live imaging and multiscale analysis identify heterogeneity and core principles of epithelial organoid morphogenesis.BMC biology · 2021Article
- Improved Quantification of Cell Density in the Arterial Wall-A Novel Nucleus Splitting Approach Applied to 3D Two-Photon Laser-Scanning Microscopy.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Mapping mesoscale axonal projections in the mouse brain using a 3D convolutional network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Volumetric Segmentation of Cell Cycle Markers in Confocal Images Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Software tools for 3D nuclei segmentation and quantitative analysis in multicellular aggregates.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Bioinformatics analysis of whole slide images reveals significant neighborhood preferences of tumor cells in Hodgkin lymphoma.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- DeepSynth: Three-dimensional nuclear segmentation of biological images using neural networks trained with synthetic data.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- An image-based assay to quantify changes in proliferation and viability upon drug treatment in 3D microenvironments.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- Three-Dimensional Segmentation and Reconstruction of Neuronal Nuclei in Confocal Microscopic Images.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019Article
- VOTING-BASED SEGMENTATION OF OVERLAPPING NUCLEI IN CLARITY IMAGES.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2018Article
- A new cell-laden 3D Alginate-Matrigel hydrogel resembles human breast cancer cell malignant morphology, spread and invasion capability observed "in vivo".Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Image analysis of neural stem cell division patterns in the zebrafish brain.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018Article
- Robust Cell Detection for Large-Scale 3D Microscopy Using GPU-Accelerated Iterative Voting.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2018Article
- Deciphering tissue morphodynamics using bioimage informatics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- A novel toolbox to investigate tissue spatial organization applied to the study of the islets of Langerhans.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Multiscale image analysis reveals structural heterogeneity of the cell microenvironment in homotypic spheroids.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Quantitative three-dimensional evaluation of immunofluorescence staining for large whole mount spheroids with light sheet microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to the large amount of data produced by advanced microscopy, automated image analysis is crucial in modern biology. Most applications require reliable cell nuclei segmentation. However, in many biological specimens cell nuclei are densely packed and appear to touch one another in the images. Therefore, a major difficulty of three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation is the decomposition of cell nuclei that apparently touch each other. Current methods are highly adapted to a certain biological specimen or a specific microscope. They do not ensure similarly accurate segmentation performance, i.e. their robustness for different datasets is not guaranteed. Hence, these methods require elaborate adjustments to each dataset.
resultsWe present an advanced three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation algorithm that is accurate and robust. Our approach combines local adaptive pre-processing with decomposition based on Lines-of-Sight (LoS) to separate apparently touching cell nuclei into approximately convex parts. We demonstrate the superior performance of our algorithm using data from different specimens recorded with different microscopes. The three-dimensional images were recorded with confocal and light sheet-based fluorescence microscopes. The specimens are an early mouse embryo and two different cellular spheroids. We compared the segmentation accuracy of our algorithm with ground truth data for the test images and results from state-of-the-art methods. The analysis shows that our method is accurate throughout all test datasets (mean F-measure: 91%) whereas the other methods each failed for at least one dataset (F-measure≤69%). Furthermore, nuclei volume measurements are improved for LoS decomposition. The state-of-the-art methods required laborious adjustments of parameter values to achieve these results. Our LoS algorithm did not require parameter value adjustments. The accurate performance was achieved with one fixed set of parameter values.
conclusionWe developed a novel and fully automated three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation method incorporating LoS decomposition. LoS are easily accessible features that ensure correct splitting of apparently touching cell nuclei independent of their shape, size or intensity. Our method showed superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods, performing accurately for a variety of test images. Hence, our LoS approach can be readily applied to quantitative evaluation in drug testing, developmental and cell biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.