Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26049713›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2015

Robust and automated three-dimensional segmentation of densely packed cell nuclei in different biological specimens with Lines-of-Sight decomposition.

B Mathew, A Schmitz, S Muñoz-Descalzo, N Ansari, F Pampaloni, E H K Stelzer, S C Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mapping mesoscale axonal projections in the mouse brain using a 3D convolutional network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. VOTING-BASED SEGMENTATION OF OVERLAPPING NUCLEI IN CLARITY IMAGES.Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Image analysis of neural stem cell division patterns in the zebrafish brain.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Deciphering tissue morphodynamics using bioimage informatics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

B MathewBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. biena.mathew@physikalischebiologie.de.
A SchmitzBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. alexander.schmitz@physikalischebiologie.de.
S Muñoz-DescalzoDepartment of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. s.munoz-descalzo@bath.ac.uk.
N AnsariBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. nariman.ansari@physikalischebiologie.de.
F PampaloniBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. francesco.pampaloni@physikalischebiologie.de.
E H K StelzerBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. ernst.stelzer@physikalischebiologie.de.
S C FischerBuchmann Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (BMLS), Fachbereich Biowissenschaften (FB15, IZN), Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Max-von-Laue-Straße 15, 60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. sabine.fischer@physikalischebiologie.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the large amount of data produced by advanced microscopy, automated image analysis is crucial in modern biology. Most applications require reliable cell nuclei segmentation. However, in many biological specimens cell nuclei are densely packed and appear to touch one another in the images. Therefore, a major difficulty of three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation is the decomposition of cell nuclei that apparently touch each other. Current methods are highly adapted to a certain biological specimen or a specific microscope. They do not ensure similarly accurate segmentation performance, i.e. their robustness for different datasets is not guaranteed. Hence, these methods require elaborate adjustments to each dataset.

resultsWe present an advanced three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation algorithm that is accurate and robust. Our approach combines local adaptive pre-processing with decomposition based on Lines-of-Sight (LoS) to separate apparently touching cell nuclei into approximately convex parts. We demonstrate the superior performance of our algorithm using data from different specimens recorded with different microscopes. The three-dimensional images were recorded with confocal and light sheet-based fluorescence microscopes. The specimens are an early mouse embryo and two different cellular spheroids. We compared the segmentation accuracy of our algorithm with ground truth data for the test images and results from state-of-the-art methods. The analysis shows that our method is accurate throughout all test datasets (mean F-measure: 91%) whereas the other methods each failed for at least one dataset (F-measure≤69%). Furthermore, nuclei volume measurements are improved for LoS decomposition. The state-of-the-art methods required laborious adjustments of parameter values to achieve these results. Our LoS algorithm did not require parameter value adjustments. The accurate performance was achieved with one fixed set of parameter values.

conclusionWe developed a novel and fully automated three-dimensional cell nuclei segmentation method incorporating LoS decomposition. LoS are easily accessible features that ensure correct splitting of apparently touching cell nuclei independent of their shape, size or intensity. Our method showed superior performance compared to state-of-the-art methods, performing accurately for a variety of test images. Hence, our LoS approach can be readily applied to quantitative evaluation in drug testing, developmental and cell biology.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPattern Recognition, AutomatedAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell NucleusComputational BiologyEmbryo, MammalianFemaleImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMiceMicroscopy, FluorescencePancreatic NeoplasmsSpheroids, Cellular

Identifiers

PMID26049713
PMCPMC4458345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.